Does Meaning in Poetry Matter? A Judge's Honest Answer
A contest judge argues that poems do not need a paraphrasable message, they need a center of gravity. Includes a before and after edit and a five-question test you can run on your own poem tonight.
In February I gave one of my highest scores of the month to a poem about a kitchen chair. Nothing happened in it. Nobody died, nobody confessed, no metaphor turned into a lesson. The poem looked at the chair, the cigarette burn on its arm, the shape of a father who no longer sat in it, and stopped. Two other judges asked me what the poem meant. I told them the truth: I had no idea, and I would defend it against every tidy poem in the stack.
That fight, the fight about meaning in poetry, is the oldest one in any workshop, and most poets inherit a lazy version of it. Either a poem must say something, preferably something you could read at a funeral, or meaning is a trap for amateurs and the real artists float above it. Both positions produce bad poems. Here is the position I actually score by, after reading thousands of contest entries: a poem does not need a meaning you can paraphrase. It needs a center of gravity you can feel.
What Meaning in Poetry Actually Is
The phrase gets used as if it named one thing. It names at least three. There is paraphrase meaning: what you would tell a friend the poem is about. There is felt meaning: the specific weather the poem builds in a reader's chest, which often resists summary completely. And there is structural meaning: the way the poem's choices, its line breaks, its sounds, its silences, argue for a way of seeing. A poem can be nearly empty of the first kind and enormous in the other two. The chair poem was.
Archibald MacLeish compressed the hard version of this into two lines in 1926:
A poem should not mean
But be.
Poets love quoting that couplet and skipping the rest of "Ars Poetica," which is a list of precise physical instructions, all fruit and worn stone and moonlight climbing a wall. MacLeish is not saying poems should be meaningless. He is saying the meaning should live in the body of the poem, in its imagery and weight and pacing, not in a caption stapled to the final stanza. That distinction is the whole game, and it is worth being stubborn about.
The Sermon and the Fog
Judging teaches you that poems fail at meaning in exactly two directions, and the failures are mirror images.
The sermon is the poem that knew its message before the first line existed. Everything in it is staff, hired to deliver the point. The rain is sadness. The bird is hope. The last stanza turns to the camera and explains what you were supposed to feel, in case the hired rain did not manage it. Readers are not stupid and they can smell being managed. You can spot a sermon in your own draft by these symptoms:
- The final stanza could be deleted and a greeting card inserted with no loss.
- Every image points the same direction, like arrows on a diagram.
- Abstract nouns arrive in pairs: love and loss, hope and fear, time and memory.
- You could state the message before you wrote the poem, and the finished poem states it again.
The fog is the opposite failure, and it flatters smarter writers. Obscurity gets mistaken for depth: private references nobody can enter, syntax scrambled on principle, twelve images with no shared weather. The fog poet often cites nonsense verse in self-defense, and the defense collapses on contact, because Carroll's "Jabberwocky" has ferocious clarity of feeling. "'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves / Did gyre and gimble in the wabe" tells you almost nothing and makes you feel one exact thing: gleeful menace in a wood. The words are invented; the gravity is not. Fog has no gravity. It only has weather vanes spinning in different directions.
A Worked Example: Kill the Message, Keep the Meaning
Here is the kind of stanza I see forty times a month, written by me just now so nobody gets embarrassed:
Time takes everything we love away.
The chair sits empty in the kitchen now,
a symbol of the ones that we have lost,
reminding us to cherish every day.
Every line is true and none of it means anything, in the felt sense. "Symbol" is the poet elbowing you. "Cherish every day" is the sermon arriving on schedule. Now the same material with the message amputated:
The chair keeps his shape without him,
the left arm's burn mark, cigarette round.
Some mornings I still pour two coffees.
I drink mine standing up.
No symbol announced, no lesson offered, and the second version says more about grief than the first version says about anything. Notice what carries the meaning: a burn mark with a shape, a second coffee, a body that refuses the empty chair by standing. The reader assembles the feeling personally, which is why it lands. Meaning you assemble yourself weighs ten times what meaning you are handed.
The Gravity Test: Five Questions to Ask Tonight
When I am unsure about a draft, mine or anyone's, I run this sequence. It takes fifteen minutes.
- Name the center in five words or fewer. Not a theme like "loss," a felt thing: "nobody sits in his chair." If you cannot name a center, the poem is fog. If the center is a moral, the poem is a sermon.
- Check every image against the center. Each image should fall toward it like objects toward a planet. An image that points elsewhere is either the seed of a different poem or dead weight. Cut or transplant it.
- Delete the explanation lines. Find every line that tells the reader what to feel or what something stands for. Delete all of them at once, then reread. Nine times out of ten the poem gets stronger immediately. The tenth time, you have learned where the real work is.
- Read it aloud to one person and ask what they felt. Not what it meant. If they name a feeling anywhere near your center, the poem works. If they summarize a message, you have preached. If they shrug, you have fogged.
- Look at the last two lines. An ending should open a door, not close a file. If your ending answers the poem, trade it for the image that asks the question best, and end there.
When a Poem Does Owe the Reader Something
None of this is a license for privacy. A poem may refuse to explain itself; it may not refuse to let the reader in. Every poem owes its reader a doorway: a stable ground situation, a speaker to stand beside, some literal level that holds. Dickinson, the patron saint of slantwise meaning, almost never abandons the literal level. You can trace what is physically happening in her strangest work even while the significance stays wild, which is a large part of why her poems keep paying out for readers a century and a half later. Withhold the paraphrase all you like. Never withhold entry.
This matters double in contests. When we score entries at Writory each month, the sheet splits into five criteria: creativity, emotion, structure, language, theme, and a poem with no paraphrasable message can still sweep the first four. What sinks poems is not missing meaning. It is missing gravity, the sermon's fake gravity or the fog's absent one. If you want to test where your own work sits, the fastest teacher I know is submitting a poem and reading the breakdown honestly.
Stop Asking What It Means
The question "what does this poem mean" has probably damaged more young poets than any other sentence in education, because it implies a poem is a locked box with a message inside, and reading is safecracking. Nobody loves a poem that way. You love a poem the way you love a room in your grandmother's house: the light, the smell, the specific gravity of the objects in it. Ask instead: what does this poem want me to feel, and what is it doing, line by line, to build that? Those questions have answers, and the answers make you a better writer by Friday.
A poem does not need a message. It needs a gravity: one center that every line falls toward.
The chair poem never told me what it meant. It told me where its center was, and then every detail in it fell toward that center until the whole thing hummed. That hum is the meaning. Write toward the felt thing, cut everything that explains it, and let the reader do the falling. They want to. It is the entire reason they picked up the poem.
By Team Writory, for Writory.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.