Translated Poems in Contests: 7 Rules Poets Miss
Translation is real authorship, but contests treat it with strict and often unwritten rules. A judge lays out the rights questions, a seven-point checklist, and the craft that makes a translation win.
The most heartbreaking disqualification I ever had to sign off on was a beautiful poem. Fourteen lines about a drowned village, gorgeous control of pacing, an ending that landed like a dropped glass. Then a co-judge, who reads Portuguese, recognized it. It was a faithful translation of a living Brazilian poet's work, submitted under the entrant's own name, no credit, no permission. The entrant, when we wrote to her, was genuinely confused: she had done the translating, so wasn't the English hers? This is the tangle at the heart of translated poems in contests, and almost nobody explains it before the disqualification email arrives.
So let me explain it, as a judge who admires translation, publishes translators, and still has to enforce the rules that catch them.
Who Owns a Translation, Really
Legally and artistically, a translation has two parents. The original poet owns the underlying work. The translator owns the specific English choices. Both claims are real, and contest rules have to respect both, which is why the rules feel stricter here than anywhere else.
The practical consequences break down cleanly. If the original poem is still in copyright, which broadly means the poet is alive or died within the last several decades, you need the rights holder's permission to publish or enter a translation of it, full stop. Doing the labor of translating grants you exactly nothing without that permission. If the original is in the public domain, generally works published before 1928 and often more recent depending on the country, you may translate freely, but you must still credit the original poet. Rilke does not need royalties. He still needs his name on the poem.
And here is the inverse case poets forget: translations themselves carry their own copyright. A 1995 English translation of a 1910 poem is protected until long after the translator's death. You cannot lift phrases from someone else's translation and call the result yours. Two translators working honestly from the same original will diverge within a line; identical phrasing is evidence, and judges who work in that language will spot it.
What Contests Actually Allow for Translated Poems
Rules pages rarely say the word translation. You have to infer the policy from three phrases, and I recommend doing it before you enter, not after. Look for original work, which in most contests means the poem must originate with you, excluding translations of others entirely. Look for previously unpublished, which catches translations whose originals are famous: some contests treat a translation of a published poem as published material. And look for sole author, which quietly excludes co-authored work, and a translation is legally co-authored with the original poet.
When the rules are silent, write and ask. Every serious contest answers this email, and I have never seen an entrant penalized for asking. The categories of answer you will get:
- Translations barred outright: the most common policy for general contests, including ours. The contest is judging your poem, not your rendering of someone else's.
- Translations welcome with permissions: typical of dedicated translation prizes, which usually require proof of rights and the original text alongside the entry.
- Public domain translations allowed with credit: a middle path some journals and themed contests take.
- Self-translation allowed: nearly universal, and the most interesting category, which deserves its own section.
Self-Translation Is Original Work: Use That
Here is the good news hiding in all this law. If you wrote the poem in Bengali, Spanish, or Yoruba, and you render it into English yourself, both parents of the translation are you. That poem is original work by any contest's definition, and you owe permission to no one. For the multilingual poets who make up a huge share of international contest entrants, this is a genuine advantage, not a workaround.
I judged a self-translated entry last spring that has stayed with me. The poet, from Jakarta, noted that the poem existed first in Indonesian. Her English version kept a syntax that English natives would never produce, the verb arriving late, the pronoun withheld, and the strangeness was the poem's engine. It scored near the top on language precisely because it did not sound like everyone else. Self-translation, done honestly, imports music that monolingual poets cannot fake. If your first language is not English, stop treating that as a handicap to sand off. It is a register nobody else in the pile has.
A translation is a poem that remembers being another poem. The reader should feel the memory, not the seams.
The Craft: Two Versions of One Rilke Line
Now the part that decides whether a permitted translation actually places: translation is composition, not transcription. Take the opening of Rilke's Herbsttag, published in 1902 and safely in the public domain: Herr: es ist Zeit. Der Sommer war sehr gross. Here are two renderings I drafted to show the fork every translator faces:
Version one: Lord: it is time. The summer was very great.
Version two: Lord, it is time. The summer was immense.
Version one is more literal and it is worse poetry: very great is limp in English in a way sehr gross is not in German. Version two spends one word, immense, to buy back the original's weight, and swaps the colon for a comma because English handles the address differently. Neither choice is free. Every line of a translation is thirty decisions like this, which is exactly why judges in translation prizes score the translator's ear, not their dictionary. If you want to build that ear, the fastest drill I know is translating strict forms, where the constraint forces choices: try carrying a rhymed quatrain or a ghazal's refrain across languages and you will learn more about English in an afternoon than a month of free composition teaches.
The Seven-Point Checklist Before You Enter
Run every translation, including self-translations, through this list before it goes anywhere near an entry form:
- Confirm the original's copyright status. Death date of the poet plus your country's term. When in doubt, assume it is protected.
- Secure written permission if it is protected. An email from the poet or their publisher, saved as a PDF. Verbal permission evaporates exactly when you need it.
- Check the contest's definition of original work. Read the rules page, then the FAQ, then ask directly if it is still unclear.
- Credit the original poet on the manuscript itself. A line under the title: translated from the Spanish of X. Not in the cover letter, on the poem.
- Verify you never consulted another English translation while drafting. If you did, set yours aside for a month and re-translate clean from the original.
- Declare it in the submission notes. Judges forgive almost anything declared and almost nothing discovered.
- Keep your process file. Original text, your drafts, permission emails. If a question ever arises, this file ends it in five minutes.
Notice the theme: every item is about making your honesty visible. Contests do not disqualify translators for translating. They disqualify them for silence.
Where to Send It Instead, and What to Send Here
Let me land the argument honestly. If your poem is a translation of another living poet's work, a general contest is the wrong room for it even with permission, because judges scoring creativity cannot untangle your invention from the original's. Send it to dedicated translation prizes, journals with translation sections, and folios that celebrate exactly this art. That work matters more than most contest poems do, and it deserves readers who judge it as translation.
But if you carry two languages, the contest-ready move is different: write the poem yourself, in whichever language it arrives in, and bring it into English with your own hands. That poem is wholly yours, strangeness and all, and the strangeness is an asset. Every month I watch entries from fifty-plus countries, and the ones that place are rarely the ones that sound most conventionally English; they are the ones where a real voice survived the crossing. If you have a poem like that in a drawer, enter it this month and see how the language score treats your accent on the page; the criteria reward precision, not passport. And if you are still unsure what counts as yours, the short answer that covers ninety percent of cases lives in one sentence: you may enter what you made, you must credit what you carried, and you may never enter what you copied. For the remaining ten percent, the rules question page on translations covers the edge cases, and my inbox covers the rest.
By Team Writory, for Writory.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.