Write Bad Poems on Purpose: The 100-Draft Practice
A contest judge makes the case for writing 100 bad poems on purpose, with the exact rules, a before-and-after draft, and the story of the entry that proved quantity quietly beats perfectionism.
A ceramics teacher once split a class in two. The left side would be graded on quantity alone: fifty pounds of pots earns an A, quality ignored. The right side had to produce one perfect pot. When grading day came, the story in Art and Fear reports, the best pots all came from the quantity side. Poets are the perfection group, almost all of us, which is why the most useful assignment I give is a deliberate write bad poems practice: one hundred poems, written on purpose to be unremarkable, finished fast, filed without ceremony.
It sounds like a joke. It is the fastest route to a good poem I have ever seen. The perfection students spent their term theorizing about excellence and produced elaborate plans and dead clay; the quantity students made mistake after mistake, and the mistakes taught their hands what no theory could. I want to lay out exactly how to run the poetry version.
Why the Write Bad Poems Practice Works
Three mechanisms, and none of them is mystical. First, volume forces variety. Nobody can write a hundred poems about autumn leaves; somewhere around poem nine you run out of your default subjects and your default voice, and the interesting material underneath starts leaking out. The clichés have to be exhausted before they can be escaped, and exhausting them takes reps, not willpower.
Second, low stakes restore honest attention. A poet protecting a precious single draft writes defensively, reaching for phrases that already sound like poetry because those feel safe. A poet on draft 43 of 100 has nothing to protect, so she writes what she actually noticed: the smell of the bus seat, the specific lie her uncle told. Judges can feel the difference instantly. Defensive poems are smooth and dead. Careless poems are lumpy and alive.
Third, quantity trains the only skill that separates working poets from stalled ones: finishing. A hundred completed drafts means a hundred experiences of pushing through the sag in the middle, a hundred endings attempted. Endings are a muscle. You cannot build it by abandoning everything at line six.
Perfectionism is not high standards. It is fear holding a clipboard.
What Counts as a Bad Poem (and What Does Not)
The word "bad" needs a contract, because the practice fails in two directions. Some poets hear "bad" and produce contempt: deliberately silly doggerel written with a smirk. That teaches nothing, because contempt is just perfectionism inverted; you are still refusing to risk sincerity. Other poets cannot lower the bar at all and secretly polish each draft, which turns the challenge into a hundred-week death march.
The contract is this: a bad poem is a sincere attempt, completed quickly, with the quality question suspended. You try to say something true. You just do not stop to fix it.
- It has a beginning, a middle, and an attempted ending. Fragments do not count.
- It took less than twenty minutes. Past twenty, you are polishing.
- It contains at least one thing you actually observed this week.
- It gets a number and a date, not a title you agonize over.
- You are allowed to like it. You are not allowed to fix it yet.
The 100 Bad Poems Challenge, Step by Step
Here is the full protocol. It takes roughly fourteen weeks at one poem a day with rest days, or a wilder month if you double up.
- Buy one cheap notebook. Cheapness is load-bearing. A beautiful journal whispers that its pages deserve beautiful poems, and that whisper will kill the practice by page three.
- Set the daily container: twenty minutes, one poem, done. A kitchen timer works. When it rings, write an ending, even a clumsy one, within two more minutes.
- Rotate prompts on a three-day cycle. Day one: an object within arm's reach. Day two: a memory attached to a specific address. Day three: a borrowed constraint, a form or a prompt you did not choose. When you need a supply line, pull from a prompt page rather than waiting for a mood.
- Every tenth poem, change one mechanical variable. Write in second person. Write without adjectives. Write a haiku sequence instead of free verse. The variable resets your ear.
- Do not reread until poem 25. Then reread the batch in one sitting, mark your two favorite lines per batch with a star, and go back to producing. Stars, not edits.
- At poem 100, hold the harvest. One evening, all starred lines copied onto a single page. That page is the real product of the practice, and it is usually startling.
Poem 61: The Entry That Changed My Mind
I used to think of this as a beginner's exercise until a submission proved otherwise. Two summers ago I scored a contest poem about a mother's hearing aid, how she turned it off during arguments, and the poem was so exact and so unhurried that I flagged it for the shortlist on first read. The poet's bio note mentioned, almost as an aside, that it was "number 61" of a hundred-poem project, drafted in nineteen minutes and rebuilt from its best four lines a month later.
What struck me was the poem's complete lack of strain. Poems written as The Poem, the single precious attempt, almost always push too hard in the final stanza, grabbing for significance. Number 61 just ended, quietly, on the image of the mother smiling at the silenced room. The poet could afford that restraint because sixty other drafts had already absorbed all the grabbing. She went on to place in the top ten that month, one of several thousand entries from the fifty-plus countries the contest draws from, and I have recommended the hundred-poem project to every plateaued poet since.
A Worked Example: Draft 14 and What It Became
Here is what a legitimate bad poem looks like. Draft 14, written in twelve minutes, sincere and mediocre:
My grandmother's garden is gone now,
the new owners paved it for parking.
She grew tomatoes there for forty years.
Time takes everything away from us.
Filed, numbered, forgotten. At the poem-25 reread, one line earned a star: the paving. A month later, the harvest rebuild took that single fact and pushed on it:
The new owners poured concrete
over forty years of tomatoes.
Somewhere under the sedan,
her stakes are still standing.
Notice what the practice made possible. The first draft's last line, the worst kind of summary, could be cut without grief because the draft cost twelve minutes. The buried stakes, the image that makes the poem, only surfaced because the poet was rebuilding from a starred line instead of defending a whole precious draft. That workflow, produce cheaply, star honestly, rebuild rarely, is the entire method.
How to Mine the Pile for the Good One
The hundred poems are ore, not product, and mining them is its own short discipline. Read the starred-lines page and look for repeated obsessions you did not know you had: the same river, the same brother, the same guilt wearing different costumes. Those repetitions are your actual subjects, the ones your defended writing avoids. Pick the three strongest lines that share an obsession and draft a new poem that contains all three. This rebuild is where you finally slow down, count your stresses, weigh every break, and use everything the fast drafts could not.
Then test one in public. Revision without exposure curdles into a new perfectionism, so send the best rebuild to a venue that will actually respond. A contest that returns a scored breakdown on creativity, emotion, structure, language, and theme, the way Writory's monthly contest does for every entrant, turns the test into another rep of the same practice: produce, get honest signal, produce again. The poets in our academy who improve fastest are never the ones guarding two perfect poems. They are the ones with a pile.
Permission Is a Skill
People treat permission to write badly as a personality trait, something relaxed writers are born with. It is not. It is a skill, built exactly the way the ceramics students built theirs, by making the next pot before the last one has finished disappointing you. The hundred bad poems are not a detour on the way to your good poem. They are the road, and every poet whose work I have watched transform walked it, numbered notebook in hand, twenty minutes at a time.
Start tonight. Poem one, something within arm's reach, timer on. Make it bad on purpose, finish it anyway, and write the number at the top like a small act of defiance. Ninety-nine to go, and the good one is already somewhere in the pile, waiting for you to write your way down to it.
By Team Writory, for Writory.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.