Object Poems Writing: Why a Chair Beats the Moon
Big subjects sink most contest poems. A judge argues for the humble object poem, with a five-step drill, a worked line edit, and the three ways object poems usually fail.
The poem that won our contest two winters ago was not about death, exile, or the sea. It was about a plastic chair on a hospital balcony, the kind with one leg shorter than the others, and the poet never once told me it was really about her father. She did not have to. The chair did all of it: the wobble, the sun-bleached arms, the way nobody ever threw it out. That same month I scored sixty poems about the moon and could not tell them apart. This is my standing argument for the object poems writing habit: build the poem not around your feelings but around a thing you could trip over.
Poets resist this. An object feels too small for what they carry. But smallness is exactly the point. The big subjects arrive pre-loaded with everyone else's language, and you spend the whole poem fighting off other people's lines. A chair arrives empty. Whatever ends up in it, you put there.
Why Object Poems Writing Works When Big Subjects Fail
Abstractions cannot be seen, and a reader who cannot see anything cannot feel much either. Grief, longing, injustice: these are conclusions, and readers do not want your conclusions, they want your evidence. An object is pure evidence. It has weight, temperature, damage, history. When you write the object honestly, the abstraction assembles itself inside the reader without your supervision, which is the only place an abstraction ever convinces anyone.
There is a second, sneakier benefit. Objects discipline sentiment. You cannot weep all over a stapler for twenty lines; the stapler will not allow it. The object keeps pulling you back to the observable world, and the observable world is where poems live. This is why imagery sits at the center of nearly every scoring rubric I have ever worked with: it is the difference between telling me you were sad and handing me the cold cup of coffee you never finished.
Write the chair honestly enough and the person who sat in it walks into the poem uninvited.
The Wheelbarrow Standard
William Carlos Williams set the bar in 1923 with sixteen words:
so much depends
upon
a red wheel
barrow
Notice what he refuses to do. He never says what depends on it. He never explains the farm, the family, the economy of attention that makes the claim true. He points at the object and trusts it, and a hundred years later we are still arguing about the poem, which is the surest sign it worked. The lesson is not to write short. The lesson is that an object under sufficient pressure of attention becomes load-bearing, and the poet's job is to apply the attention and then get out of the way.
You can hear the same trust running through the old poems that still get memorized. Nobody memorizes explanations. They memorize the plums in the icebox, the snow settling on dead leaves, the creak of a particular gate. When a line survives a century of readers, go and look at what it is made of, and nine times out of ten it is made of things. Attention is the poet's only raw material, and objects are the place where attention becomes visible on the page.
An Object Poems Writing Drill for Tonight
Here is the five-step drill I give poets who tell me they have nothing to write about. It takes one evening and one object. Pick something within arm's reach that you did not choose for its beauty. The uglier and more ordinary, the better it works.
- Inventory without adjectives. Ten minutes. Describe the object in plain nouns and verbs only. No "lonely," no "faded," no editorializing. Just what a camera would report: the scratch, the screw, the stain shaped like a coastline.
- Find the damage. Every used object carries injury: a chip, a burn, a repair done badly. Write three lines about the damage only. Damage is where the object's biography leaks out.
- Establish the witness. Who else has touched this thing? Write one line placing a second human in the object's history. Not their feelings. Their hands.
- Withhold the meaning. This is the hard step. Read your draft and delete every line that explains what the object means. All of them. If the poem collapses, the objects were not doing the work yet; go back to step one. If the poem survives, it is suddenly twice as strong.
- End on the object, not the insight. Your last image should be physical. Let the reader step off the poem onto something solid.
If you want the drill with fresh objects supplied, our ordinary objects prompt rotates a new one each week, and the constraint of not choosing your own object removes the last hiding place.
A Worked Edit: The Chair, Before and After
Here is the kind of draft line I see constantly, followed by what step four does to it. Before:
The old chair sat empty in the corner,
reminding me of all the years we lost,
its emptiness a symbol of my grief.
The chair is doing nothing here. The poet is doing everything, loudly. After:
The chair keeps the corner. Nobody
oils the joint that answers every weather.
The seat still bows where bowing was learned.
Same chair, same grief, but now the grief is in the joinery. "Where bowing was learned" carries the vanished body without naming it, and the creak that "answers every weather" gives the object a stubborn, ongoing life that outlasted its person. Nothing is explained. Everything is felt. That is the entire trade: you give up the announcement and you get the ache.
The Three Ways Object Poems Go Wrong
I score object poems every month, and when they fail, they fail in one of three predictable ways.
- The forced epiphany. Twelve honest lines about a thimble, then a final couplet that lunges at the meaning of life. The ending betrays the poem's own method. If your object poem needs a moral, the object was not carrying enough.
- The catalog without pressure. Description alone is not a poem; it is a listing. Something must be at stake in the looking. The damage step exists precisely to install stakes.
- Personification overload. The teapot sighs, the curtains mourn, the doorknob remembers. A touch of personification can be beautiful; a full costume party is exhausting. Let the object stay an object for most of the poem and its one human gesture will land like thunder.
There is a fourth failure worth naming, though it is rarer: the object chosen for its poetry. Lighthouses, hourglasses, antique compasses, pocket watches. If the thing arrives already symbolic, it brings the same rented language the big abstractions do, and you are back where you started. Choose the thing that has never been in a poem before. That is where the open ground is, and open ground is where judges notice footprints.
Objects Hold Up in Contests, and I Can Prove It
A poem I scored last winter began with a bus ticket kept in a wallet for nine years, and I still remember the fold lines, which is more than I can say for that month's many sunsets. Concrete objects are memorable to judges for the same reason they are useful to poets: they are singular. No one else's grandmother had that exact sewing machine; everyone's moon is the same moon. Writory runs a monthly international contest with entries open from the 1st to the 25th, and because every entrant sees a five-part score breakdown, object poems make for an unusually clear experiment: submit one and watch what happens to your creativity and language scores compared with your last abstract piece. Poets from more than fifty countries have run that experiment, and the pattern is not subtle.
The Object Is a Door, Not a Subject
Let me say the quiet part. Nobody actually wants to read about a chair. They want to read about being human, and the chair is how you smuggle that past their defenses. Readers brace against the big words; they have been hurt by bad poems before. But no one braces against furniture. The object gets you inside, and once inside, you can do anything.
So tonight, skip the moon. Pick up the nearest thing with a scratch on it and give it forty minutes of ruthless attention. Somewhere around step four, when you delete your explanations and the poem stands anyway, you will feel the floor of your writing get more solid. That floor is where every durable poem I have ever scored was standing.
By Team Writory, for Writory.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.