Can't Understand Difficult Poems? Read This First
Difficult poems are not locks to pick. A contest judge shares a five-pass reading method, a Hopkins test case, and the mindset shift that turns confusion into the most useful part of reading.
A woman at one of our workshops once slid a Gerard Manley Hopkins poem across the table and said, quietly, as if confessing a crime: I have read this eleven times and I still don't know what it means. She expected me to explain it. Instead I asked her what the poem felt like, and she answered instantly: like standing under a hawk. That is not failure. That is reading. Most advice on how to understand difficult poems treats a poem like a safe with a combination, and the reader like someone who forgot the numbers. I want to argue the opposite, and then give you the five-pass method I actually use, the one that has carried me through thousands of contest entries, some of them gloriously strange.
The Lie Your English Class Taught You
Somewhere around age fourteen, most of us were taught that a poem is a puzzle with one hidden answer, and that the teacher had the answer key. Get it right, get the marks. Get it wrong, feel stupid. That single classroom habit has done more damage to adult poetry readers than every difficult poet combined, because it trains you to experience confusion as a verdict on your intelligence rather than as the opening move of the poem.
Here is the truth from the judging table: I read poems for a living, and I am confused on a first pass all the time. The difference between a practised reader and a frustrated one is not comprehension speed. It is what each does with the confusion. The frustrated reader treats it as a wall. The practised reader treats it as weather, something you stand in for a while until your eyes adjust.
A poem is not a lock you pick. It is a room you get used to in the dark.
A 5-Pass Method to Understand Difficult Poems
This is the sequence I give every new reader, and honestly, the one I still run on dense work. Each pass has one job. Do not let a pass do another pass's job.
- Pass one: read it aloud for sound only. No decoding allowed. You are listening for music, speed, texture, where the poem gets loud or hushed. Difficult poets almost always pay you first in sound, and your ear will register patterns your brain cannot name yet.
- Pass two: name the feeling, not the meaning. One sentence, spoken or written: this poem feels like standing under a hawk, like a door closing, like being talked over at a funeral. This is the pass your English class skipped, and it matters most, because feeling is data. Poets arrange every image and rhythm to produce it, so your gut response is usually pointing straight at the poem's centre.
- Pass three: find the ground situation. Ask the reporter questions. Who seems to be speaking? To whom? Where might we be standing? What actually happens, even if it is only: a person looks at a bird. Most difficult poems have a simple ground floor with elaborate architecture built on top. Find the floor.
- Pass four: circle the three strangest choices. A broken word, a repeated phrase, an image that seems to belong to another poem. Then ask of each: what does the poem gain by doing this instead of the normal thing? You are no longer asking what does this mean. You are asking why this move, which is a question you can always make progress on.
- Pass five: read it aloud again and notice what changed. Same words, different poem. The lines that resisted you will have shifted, and the ones that still resist are the poem's genuine mysteries, the part it intends to keep. You are allowed to leave them alone.
Running the Method on Real Lines
Take the opening of Hopkins's The Windhover, published in 1918 and safely in the public domain:
I caught this morning morning's minion, king-
dom of daylight's dauphin, dapple-dawn-drawn Falcon
On paper this looks like a keyboard accident. Pass one, aloud, and it becomes a drumroll; the alliteration practically flies the bird for you. Pass two: it feels like awe arriving faster than grammar can handle. Pass three, the ground floor: a man sees a falcon at dawn and is overwhelmed. That is the entire situation. Pass four, the strange choices: why break the word kingdom across a line ending? Say it aloud and you hear the answer, the poem hangs king at the line's edge the way the falcon hangs on the wind, and the break makes your voice ride the air with it. Why minion and dauphin, words from royal courts? Because Hopkins is crowning the bird, making dawn a royal household. Suddenly the passage is not obscure at all. It is precise beyond what plain syntax could manage, which is generally why difficult poems are difficult: not to exclude you, but because the poet needed effects that easy sentences cannot produce. That hanging line break is worth knowing by name; we keep a plain-language entry on enjambment in the glossary because it is the single device that explains the most difficulty per minute of study.
The Contest Entry That Rewired Me as a Judge
A few winters ago I scored a poem about, as far as I could tell on first read, a flooded kitchen. Fragments, no punctuation, water imagery colliding with wedding imagery. My pen actually hovered over a low structure score. But our process makes me read every entry more than once, so I ran my own passes on it, and on the third read the ground floor surfaced: the speaker was mopping a floor the morning after a marriage ended, and the missing punctuation was the poem's whole argument, grief with no full stops in it. It ended up as one of the highest scores I gave that month. The lesson was not that the poem was secretly simple. The lesson was that my first-pass confusion had been an accurate reading of a poem about disorientation, and the poet had earned every ounce of it. Since then I refuse to call a poem unclear until I can say what its difficulty is doing.
When a Poem Is Actually Bad
Let me be fair to your frustration, because some difficulty is fraudulent. After thousands of entries I can tell you the difference usually shows up in three places:
- Earned difficulty pays you on every pass. Hopkins gives you sound before sense. A bad difficult poem gives you nothing on pass one and nothing on pass five.
- Earned difficulty has a floor. Somewhere under the strangeness there is a speaker, a situation, a stake. If five honest passes turn up no ground at all, the obscurity may be decoration or disguise.
- Earned difficulty is consistent. The strange moves repeat and rhyme with each other, the way the missing punctuation ran the whole length of that kitchen poem. Random difficulty scatters; deliberate difficulty patterns.
So yes, you are allowed to close a book and say: this one did not hold up its end. But say it after the passes, not instead of them. The tragedy is not readers disliking difficult poems. It is readers who were taught to sprint for meaning, tripping at the first strange line of a poem that would have paid them richly by the third visit. If you want supervised practice, the close readings in our academy walk through knotty classics one strange choice at a time, and a poem like The Windhover is a perfect first patient.
Confusion Is a Place, Not a Verdict
Here is where I land. The feeling you get from a difficult poem, that suspended, slightly lost, oddly alert state, is not the obstacle between you and the reading. In most serious poems it is part of the reading, as deliberate as a key change. Writers spend years learning to produce that state on purpose. When you stop treating it as evidence against yourself, you gain access to the entire top shelf of the art form, the poems that keep unfolding for decades, and you will find your patience repaid in a currency easy poems cannot print.
It changes your writing too. The poets who read difficult work stop over-explaining their own, because they have felt, from the inside, how much a reader can be trusted with. If you want to test that on your own poems, Writory's monthly contest returns a five-criteria score to every single entrant, so you can submit and see your score and find out whether your strangest choices are landing as mystery or as fog. Either way, go back to whatever poem defeated you last, and give it the five passes. Stand in the dark room a little longer. The furniture is there. Your eyes just need the time you were never taught to give them.
By Team Writory, for Writory.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.