Why Write Poetry Nobody Reads? A Serious Answer
A poet asked me why she keeps writing after forty years and six readers. Here is the serious answer: what unread poems do, who they wait for, and why finishing still matters.
Last November, a few days after results went out, a poet wrote to me. Her scores were fine. Her note was not about the scores. It said: "I am 61. I have written poems for forty years. My husband has read maybe six of them. Why do I keep doing this?" If you have ever asked why write poetry when almost nobody will read it, you deserve a serious answer, not the greeting-card one about self-expression. I have read thousands of contest entries, and I think about her question more than any poem I scored that month. So here is my honest attempt.
The Question Behind the Question
Notice what the question assumes: that a poem is a broadcast, and a broadcast with no audience is a failure. That assumption comes from everywhere else in modern life. A post with no likes feels like a stone dropped down a well. A product with no customers gets discontinued. We import that logic into poetry without checking whether it fits.
It does not fit. A poem is not a broadcast. It is closer to a tool, and a tool is judged by what it does, not by how many people watch you use it. Nobody asks a carpenter why she keeps a plane sharp if no crowd gathers to watch her shave a door. The door closes properly. That is the point.
So the real question is not "why write poetry nobody reads." It is "what does a poem do when reading is not the payoff?" Quite a lot, it turns out.
Why Write Poetry? First, Clear Out the Wrong Answers
Before the good reasons, the bad ones, because they quietly poison people. I hear these constantly and I want them off the table:
- "Because you might get discovered." You might. But if discovery is the engine, the engine dies the first year nothing happens, and most years nothing happens.
- "Because it's therapy." Writing can be therapeutic, but therapy aims at the writer feeling better, and poems aim at being true. Those goals overlap maybe half the time.
- "Because self-expression matters." A scream is self-expression. A poem is self-expression that has been made accountable to craft. The second half is where the value lives, and this slogan skips it.
Each of these answers accepts the broadcast model and just promises a delayed audience. The honest answer refuses the model itself.
Emily Dickinson and the Math of 1,775 Poems
Emily Dickinson wrote roughly 1,775 poems. Fewer than a dozen were published while she lived, most of those without her consent and edited into blandness. By the broadcast model, she failed about 99.4 percent of the time. She also wrote this:
This is my letter to the World
That never wrote to Me
Read that closely. She knows the world is not answering. She writes the letter anyway, and she calls it a letter, addressed, sealed, sent into silence. She sewed her poems into hand-stitched booklets and put them in a drawer. That is not the behavior of someone waiting for an audience. That is the behavior of someone keeping a record she believes deserves to exist. If you want the fuller story, her page in our famous poets library is a good hour spent.
Here is what I take from her math: the value of those 1,775 poems was produced on the days they were written, in the person writing them. Publication, when it finally came, distributed value that already existed. It did not create it.
What a Poem Does to the Person Writing It
The private work of a poem is attention training. You cannot write a decent poem about your father's death by feeling sad at the page. You have to go find the coat.
Here is what I mean. A first draft line, the kind I see in hundreds of entries:
I was devastated when my father passed away.
True, and inert. Now the revision, after the writer sat for twenty minutes and actually searched the house of her memory:
My father's coat still hangs behind the door.
I wore it once, to take the bins out. Twice.
Whether or not anyone ever reads those two lines, the writer now knows something she did not know before: that she wore the coat, that she did it again, that the second time was the confession. The poem forced her to retrieve a specific, and the specific turned out to hold the grief better than the word "devastated" ever could. Writing about loss this way is its own subject, and our grief theme page collects poems that do it well. But the mechanism matters here: the poem changed its writer's relationship to her own past. That happened at the desk, reader or no reader.
Do that a few hundred times over some years and you become a person who notices coats, hesitations, second times. You walk through the same world as everyone else and see more of it. Nobody can read your poems and take that from you, because it was never in the poems. It is in you.
The Five-Audience Ladder
Now the practical part. "Nobody reads my poems" flattens five very different audiences into one. Separate them, and the despair gets much harder to sustain. Before your next draft, write one of these five at the top of the page and mean it:
- The self at the desk. The audience for the first draft is you, tonight, trying to find out what you actually think. Every poem has at least this reader. Attendance is perfect.
- The self in five years. Journals prove this audience exists. The poem you write about your daughter at seven will be read, greedily, by the person you become when she is seventeen.
- The one reader. Not an audience, a person. Write the poem to a named human being, living or dead. Dickinson's "letter to the World" was really letters to a handful of people she loved.
- The stranger. This is the contest reader, the journal editor, the person who finds the poem taped inside a library book. Rare, unpredictable, real.
- The record. The drawer. The archive. The stubborn insistence that this hour of this life was witnessed by somebody, even if the somebody was you.
Most poets torture themselves by writing on rung one and grading themselves on rung four. Pick the rung before you start. A poem written honestly for rung two or three is finished when it serves that reader, and "nobody reads it" stops being a coherent complaint.
The Reader You Cannot See
One more thing about rung four, because I have privileged information here. The claim "nobody reads poetry" is factually strange. Poetry is read at the highest-stakes moments humans have. Weddings. Funerals. Hospital waiting rooms at 3 a.m. People who have not opened a poetry book in twenty years will search desperately for the right fourteen lines when their mother dies. Poems are not read widely. They are read intensely, at the exact hours when nothing else works.
A poem I scored last winter has stayed with me: a woman writing about her bus conductor father in Lagos, how he could make change in three currencies without looking down, "his thumb reading coins like Braille." She has no idea that I have quoted that line to two friends, that it changed how I watched a ticket inspector on a train in March. Her poem, as far as she knows, was read by nobody. It is loose in the world anyway, doing things.
A poem does not need a thousand readers. It needs one reader at the exact hour of her need, and it can afford to wait years for her.
So Should You Still Send Poems Out?
Yes, and not for the reason you think. Sending work out is not how a poem finds its audience. It is how a poet finishes. A poem you will never show anyone can stay comfortably vague forever. The moment a stranger might read it, every soft line starts to itch, and you fix things you would otherwise have forgiven. Deadlines do the same work: at Writory the window runs from the 1st to the 25th every month, results land on the 30th, and every single entrant gets a five-criteria score breakdown, so even the "unread" poem comes back having been read closely by someone whose only job was to read it. If you have a drawer poem that deserves a stranger, send it this month and see what the itch makes you fix first.
But notice the order of operations. You do not write in order to submit. You submit in order to write better. The contest, the journal, the reading: all of it is scaffolding around the real event, which is still you, the desk, the coat behind the door.
Write Like Nobody Is Reading, Finish Like Somebody Is
So here is the answer I finally sent to the poet who wrote to me in November. Forty years of poems and six readers is not a failure rate. It is a forty-year practice of paying attention, with six occasions of witness, and every one of those poems is still eligible for the reader who has not needed it yet.
The question "why write poetry nobody reads" answers itself the way "why cook when nobody's coming to dinner" does. Because you are there. Because you are hungry. Because the difference between a life that gets written down and a life that does not is not measured in readers. It is measured in what the writing made you notice while you still had time to notice it.
Write the poems. Put some in the drawer and send some to strangers. The drawer is not a graveyard. It is a waiting room, and somebody is always, eventually, called in.
By Team Writory, for Writory.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.