Television by Roald Dahl
Quick answer: Television by Roald Dahl explained for ICSE students: summary of the Oompa-Loompa song, the screens versus books theme, tone, poetic devices and exam answers.
Most protest poems are solemn. Roald Dahl's Television is a protest poem that arrives shouting, joking and exaggerating wildly, and it has been making children laugh while lecturing their parents since 1964. It began life inside Charlie and the Chocolate Factory as the song the Oompa-Loompas sing after Mike Teavee, the boy obsessed with television, gets himself shrunk by the very machine he worships. Lifted out of the novel and printed as a poem, it now sits in the ICSE Treasure Trove anthology, where it is usually the funniest thing on the syllabus.
Because the poem is still in copyright, this guide analyses it in notes form rather than reproducing the text; keep your anthology open beside you. What follows covers the argument movement by movement, the comic tone that makes the sermon swallowable, the couplet craft underneath the jokes, and the exam questions that reliably come up.
Where the poem comes from
Roald Dahl (1916 to 1990) was born in Wales to Norwegian parents, flew fighter planes in the Second World War, and then became one of the most read children's authors in history: James and the Giant Peach, Matilda, The BFG, and in 1964 Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. In that novel, each spoiled child who comes to grief in Willy Wonka's factory gets a mocking musical send-off from the Oompa-Loompas, and Television is the send-off for Mike Teavee.
Knowing the source matters for exams. The speaker is not Dahl in his own voice but a chorus of small, gleeful moralists inside a comic novel, which is why the poem can be so extreme. The Oompa-Loompas are allowed to say outrageous things a sober essayist never could, and Dahl uses that licence to smuggle a serious argument about childhood, attention and imagination inside an entertainment.
What the poem argues, movement by movement
The poem moves in three clear stages. The first is the attack. The most important rule ever learned about children, the singers announce, is never to let them near a television set, and better still never to install the thing at all. There follows a cartoon horror-film description of what screens do: children sit slack and hypnotised, staring until their eyes pop, their senses dulled. The set may keep them still and quiet, the poem concedes, but at a price: it kills the imagination, clogs and clutters the mind, and leaves a child unable to think for themselves. The machine is painted almost as a monster feeding on young brains.
The second movement is nostalgic. Before this monster was invented, the singers ask, what did children do? They read. The poem lingers lovingly over nurseries with books on every shelf and the worlds those books opened: tales of dragons and queens, pirates and treasure, whales and cannibals, smugglers and faraway islands. The catalogue is deliberately breathless, a tumble of adventure meant to make screen-watching look grey by comparison.
The final movement is the prescription. Throw the television out, the singers command, and put a bookshelf where it stood. Yes, the children will scream and sulk for a week or two. But boredom will do its slow magic; they will pick up a book, then another, and soon wonder how they ever lived without reading, and they will love you for the gift. The poem ends on that bargain: short-term tantrums for a lifetime of imagination.
The tone: a rant that winks
Everything in the poem is exaggerated, and the exaggeration is the point. No one, including Dahl, believes television literally rots the senses or that a child's eyes will fall out. This is hyperbole used as comedy and as rhetoric at once: by overstating the case to absurdity, the poem gets away with making the case at all. On the page, the loudest claims appear in capital letters, the typographic equivalent of a chorus shouting, which tells you exactly how seriously to take the surface and how seriously to take what is underneath.
Call the tone mock-serious, satirical or comically exaggerated in an exam and you are on safe ground. The poem is a sermon delivered by clowns. It scolds parents directly, addressing them as 'you' throughout, while entertaining the children it pretends to be protecting. That double audience is pure Dahl: the adults get the lecture, the children get the jokes, and both get the same conclusion.
Craft notes: couplets doing comedy
The poem is written in rhyming couplets with a bouncy four-beat pulse. Couplets suit comedy because the rhyme lands like a punchline every two lines, and Dahl rigs many of his rhymes for maximum silliness. The lines are short and propulsive, often spilling over into the next line so the rant never pauses for breath.
Other devices worth naming with examples from your text: direct address and imperative verbs, since the poem is one long instruction to parents; hyperbole throughout the description of screen-damage; a long catalogue or list in the books section, whose sheer abundance is itself the argument; repetition of key words for emphasis; and strong visual imagery on both sides of the contrast, the slack staring child versus the shelf of waiting adventures. Structure questions should note the three-part build: problem, golden past, solution.
Screens then and now
Dahl was writing in 1964 about a boxy set in the corner of the living room. Today's students read the poem while carrying a screen in their pocket, which makes it feel weirdly prophetic. Evaluation questions often ask whether the poem's warning still applies, and the strong answer is balanced: the hyperbole is obviously unfair as science, plenty of screen content is thoughtful, and reading is not the only path to imagination.
But the core claim has aged well: passive consumption is not the same as imaginative work, and a mind that is always fed pictures never practises making its own. A good paragraph concedes the exaggeration, then argues that exaggeration is a satirist's tool, not a factual claim, and that the underlying question, what fills a child's hours and what that does to the child, is more urgent now than when Dahl posed it.
Why it lasts
Plenty of poems tell readers to read; this is one of the very few that makes the instruction fun. It lasts because it never mistakes solemnity for seriousness. The argument is carried by jokes, rhymes and monstrous exaggeration, so children absorb it willingly, and it lasts because its target keeps renewing itself; every generation finds a new screen to worry about and rediscovers the poem waiting.
It has also endured institutionally. Syllabuses keep it because it teaches tone, hyperbole and satire vividly, and because it starts a classroom argument every single time. A poem that sixty years on can still make a room full of teenagers defend their phones is a poem that still has a pulse.
What today's poet can steal
Steal the comic rant. Pick something you genuinely think is bad for people, then argue against it in bouncing couplets with the volume turned far past reasonable. The form forces you to entertain while you argue, and the exaggeration paradoxically frees you to say what you actually mean. Poems that manage humour and conviction together are rare, and judges notice them; a well-built satirical piece stands out sharply in a contest pile, where Writory's judges score tone and language as keenly as theme.
Steal the three-part sermon shape too: paint the problem grotesquely, remember a better world lovingly, then issue the remedy as a command. It is an ancient persuasive structure, and Dahl proves it works just as well in nonsense rhyme as from a pulpit.
What poets can take from this
- Never write that Dahl literally believes television destroys the brain; identify hyperbole and explain its satirical purpose.
- Always mention the poem's origin as an Oompa-Loompa song about Mike Teavee, since the dramatic speaker shapes the tone.
- For device questions, pair each device with its effect: couplets create punchline rhythm, capitals create shouting, lists create abundance.
- Structure answers around the three movements: attack on television, celebration of books, prescription to parents.
- In evaluation questions, concede the exaggeration first, then defend the underlying argument about passive versus active imagination.
- Quote only very short phrases from your anthology in answers, and always integrate them into your own sentence.
Try it yourself
Write a comic rant in rhyming couplets against a modern habit you secretly worry about, phone scrolling, binge-watching, doomscrolling news. Exaggerate wildly, address the reader as 'you', and end with a ridiculous but heartfelt prescription.
Questions
What is the main theme of Television by Roald Dahl?
The poem argues that television dulls a child's senses and kills imagination, while books nourish creativity and independent thought. Through comic exaggeration, it urges parents to remove the television and replace it with a bookshelf. Its deeper theme is passive consumption versus active imagination.
What poetic devices are used in Television?
The poem uses rhyming couplets, hyperbole, direct address to parents, imperative commands, repetition and a long celebratory list of the adventures found in books. On the page, key lines appear in capital letters to mimic shouting. The overall device is satire: a serious argument delivered through comic exaggeration.
Who is the speaker of the poem Television?
The speaker is the chorus of Oompa-Loompas from Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, singing after Mike Teavee is shrunk by a television camera. This dramatic speaker matters because it licenses the poem's extreme claims and mock-serious tone. Dahl's own view is behind the poem, but filtered through comic performers.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated September 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.