Trees by Joyce Kilmer
Quick answer: Trees by Joyce Kilmer, analysed honestly: why the famous couplets are loved and mocked, the mixed metaphor problem, and the real craft lessons hiding in it.
No poem in American literature is simultaneously this loved and this laughed at. Trees, twelve lines in six rhymed couplets, appeared in Poetry magazine in 1913, was set to music, memorised by generations, and inspired parks, plaques and parodies in roughly equal measure. Its author, Joyce Kilmer, was killed by a sniper at the Second Battle of the Marne in 1918, aged thirty-one, which fixed the poem permanently in the public heart.
We include it here for both of its lessons. The famous opening declares that the poet will never see a poem lovely as a tree, and the whole piece unfolds that humility. What it does brilliantly, and what it does badly, are equally instructive, and pretending otherwise would waste the poem.
The poem
Poems are made by fools like me,
But only God can make a tree.
Joyce Kilmer, 'Trees' (1913)
What the poem says
The argument is simple and stated at both ends. A poem can never equal a tree, because poems are made by fools like the poet, while only God can make a tree. Between those bookends, the couplets personify the tree five ways: its hungry mouth pressed to the earth's sweet flowing breast; its gaze lifted to God all day; its leafy arms raised to pray; a nest of robins worn in its hair; snow on its bosom, and rain lived with intimately.
The poem is a piece of devotional pastoral: nature as direct evidence of God, the poet as cheerful inferior. Its sincerity is total. There is no irony anywhere in the twelve lines, which is part of why it travelled so far, and part of why sophisticated readers have never been comfortable with it.
How it works, and where it breaks
First the strengths, which are real. The tetrameter couplets are clean, the syntax is effortless, and the frame is perfect: open on the claim, spend the middle on evidence, close by capping the claim with its theological explanation. The result is one of the most memorisable poems in English, and memorability is a craft outcome, not an accident.
Now the famous problem. Track the tree's anatomy couplet by couplet: a mouth at the earth's breast, then eyes looking at God, then arms raised overhead, then hair holding a nest, then a bosom catching snow. No single body could do all this at once; each couplet restarts the personification from scratch, and the images contradict rather than compound. Critics from the New Critics onward used Trees as the textbook case of mixed metaphor, and the parodies, Ogden Nash's among them, write themselves. The lesson is precise: a conceit must be consistent to accumulate power. Kilmer's couplets are locally lovely and globally incompatible.
Why it lasts anyway
Because sincerity, rhyme and brevity are a formidable alliance. Trees says something millions of people believe, in words they can carry whole, and its author's death in uniform gave it the weight of an epitaph. Poems survive by being needed, not by being flawless, and Trees is needed at memorials, arbor days and gravesides in a way many perfect poems never are. Its afterlife is a standing reminder that the audience for poetry is larger, and differently moved, than the seminar.
What today's poet can steal
Steal the frame: state your thesis in a couplet, spend the poem on evidence, then restate the thesis transformed. It is the oldest reliable architecture for a short rhymed poem.
Then run the anatomy check Kilmer skipped: if you personify, map the body once and keep it. If you enter a poem like this in Writory's monthly contest, a conceit that stays consistent is precisely what lifts a language score; the judges read for it whether they name it or not.
What poets can take from this
- Frame a short poem with a claim up front and its transformed restatement at the close.
- Personify with one consistent body map; do not restart the figure each stanza.
- Test couplets for memorability by reciting them the next morning without looking.
- Respect sincerity as a craft choice, but make the craft around it airtight.
- Study the parodies of any famous poem; they are free lessons in its weaknesses.
Try it yourself
Write a twelve-line poem in couplets praising one ordinary living thing, keeping a single consistent personification from first line to last, and frame it with an opening claim about your own art that the ending repeats in changed words.
Questions
What is the meaning of Trees by Joyce Kilmer?
The poem argues that no human art can rival nature because nature is God's direct creation. The tree feeds at the earth, prays with lifted arms and lives with rain, while the poet cheerfully ranks his own poems below it.
Why is Trees often criticised?
Its personifications contradict each other: the tree has a mouth at the earth's breast, eyes on God, arms raised, hair holding robins and a snowy bosom, an anatomy no single figure could hold. It became the standard classroom example of mixed metaphor.
Who was Joyce Kilmer?
An American poet, journalist and Catholic convert born in 1886. He published Trees in 1913, enlisted in the First World War, and was killed in action in France in 1918. His death deepened the poem's fame as a memorial piece.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.