Automatic Writing
Quick answer: Automatic writing is composing without conscious control, letting words flow unedited. Learn its Surrealist history and how poets use it for drafting.
Automatic writing is the practice of writing as fast as possible without conscious control, censorship or correction, letting words arrive from somewhere below deliberate thought. The pen keeps moving, grammar and sense are allowed to fend for themselves, and the writer becomes, in theory, a recording instrument rather than an author. What comes out is raw material: strange, uneven, occasionally electric, and never intended as a finished poem.
Poets use it to get past their own taste. The internal editor that polishes lines also blocks the odd associations where original images live, and automatic writing is the crowbar. A ten-minute unstoppable scrawl about rain might surface one phrase, a drowned piano, a mother made of doors, worth more than an afternoon of careful drafting. Most writers then mine the transcript, keeping the live wires and discarding the noise.
History and Key Figures
The practice began outside literature, in nineteenth-century spiritualism, where mediums produced scripts they attributed to spirits. The Surrealists secularised it: Andre Breton and Philippe Soupault composed The Magnetic Fields (1919) in rapid automatic sessions, and Breton's 1924 Manifesto of Surrealism defined the whole movement as psychic automatism, thought dictated in the absence of reason's control. Meanwhile W. B. Yeats's wife George produced thousands of pages of automatic script that Yeats worked into the symbolic system of A Vision, proof that even a master formalist wanted material his waking mind could not supply.
Later, the technique went mainstream in softened forms: the freewriting exercises taught in composition classrooms and the daily longhand pages recommended in popular creativity manuals are automatic writing with the mysticism removed.
How to Do It
Set a timer for ten minutes. Write by hand if you can, since typing invites deleting. Keep the pen moving no matter what; if you stall, repeat the last word until something new comes. Do not cross out, do not reread mid-session, and do not steer toward poetry. Speed matters more than sense, because the whole point is to outrun the editor. When the timer ends, put the pages away for at least a day before mining them.
From Transcript to Poem
Reread the session as a prospector, not a judge. Underline any phrase with heat in it: an image you do not remember writing, a weird verb, a sentence that frightens you slightly. Copy the underlined material onto a fresh page and begin composing deliberately, with all your craft switched back on. Automatic writing supplies ore, and revision is the smelter; poets who skip the second stage end up publishing noise, which is why the method has both devoted users and loud sceptics.
What poets can take from this
- Write by hand, fast, for a fixed short time; stopping to think defeats the exercise.
- Never edit during a session; repeat the last word until the flow restarts.
- Let the transcript cool for a day before mining it, so you read as a stranger.
- Harvest phrases and images, not whole passages; the poem comes later, from craft.
- Use a recurring prompt word to aim the session loosely without steering it.
Try it yourself
Do three ten-minute automatic sessions on three different days, each beginning from the same word: door. Then build one poem using at least five phrases harvested across the three transcripts, revising as ruthlessly as you would any draft.
Questions
What is the difference between automatic writing and freewriting?
The mechanics are nearly identical: timed, unedited, continuous writing. Freewriting is the pragmatic classroom version aimed at fluency and idea generation, while automatic writing carries the Surrealist ambition of reaching genuinely unconscious material. In practice most poets use the terms interchangeably.
Can automatic writing produce finished poems?
Very rarely. Even the Surrealists selected and arranged their automatic texts. Treat the output as raw material with an unusually high strangeness content, then apply ordinary revision to find the poem inside it.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.