Virodhabhas Alankar
Quick answer: Virodhabhas Alankar is the alankar of apparent contradiction. Learn its paribhasha, Bihari's classic example, and how to tell it apart from virodh.
Virodhabhas alankar occurs when a statement appears to contradict itself, yet the contradiction dissolves the moment you grasp the intended meaning. The name carries its own definition: virodh means opposition and abhas means semblance or appearance, so virodhabhas is the mere appearance of a conflict, never the real thing. A line says that drowning makes something brighter, that losing was a kind of winning, that the house grew fuller as it emptied. For one startled second the sense refuses to add up; then a second meaning surfaces and everything clicks into place.
Poets prize this figure because paradox compresses truth. Devotional poets in particular, from the sant tradition to the Sufis, reached for it constantly, since the experiences they described, ego dissolving, absence feeling like presence, sit naturally in contradictory language. For students, virodhabhas is a regular in board exams, usually planted next to virodh so you must tell an apparent contradiction from an actual one. The tests below make that separation quick.
The poem
या अनुरागी चित्त की गति समुझै नहिं कोइ।
ज्यौं ज्यौं बूड़ै स्याम रंग त्यौं त्यौं उज्जलु होइ॥
Bihari, 'Bihari Satsai' (17th century)
The Paribhasha and the One-Word Test
The textbook definition is short: jahan virodh na hote hue bhi virodh ka abhas ho, vahan virodhabhas alankar hota hai. Where there is no real opposition, but an appearance of opposition arises, the ornament is virodhabhas. It belongs to the arthalankars, the meaning-based ornaments, because the effect survives translation and paraphrase; no particular word or sound is doing the work.
Hold on to one word from that definition: appearance. If the contradiction is real and remains standing after your best second reading, you are looking at virodh alankar, a plainly stated opposition. If the contradiction melts once a hidden sense is supplied, it is virodhabhas. Every exam question on this figure is, at bottom, asking you to run that single test.
How It Works: An Original Example
Take this original micro-example: 'Woh jitna haarta gaya, utna jeetta gaya.' The more he lost, the more he won. On the surface the sentence cancels itself; losing and winning cannot rise together. Then the resolution arrives: he kept losing arguments with his old father, and kept winning the old man's trust. The clash was only verbal. Two different arenas, one word of loss and one of gain, and the apparent contradiction turns out to be an exact description.
That is the engine of every virodhabhas: two senses travelling under one set of words. The poet states the paradox baldly and withholds the reconciling sense for a beat, because the pleasure lies in the reader performing the resolution. Explain it too quickly and the figure deflates into ordinary statement.
Where You Will See It: Bihari's Famous Doha
The example nearly every Hindi textbook reaches for comes from the Bihari Satsai, the seventeenth-century collection of couplets. Bihari says that nobody understands the ways of a heart in love: the deeper it drowns in the dark colour called shyam, the brighter and more radiant it becomes. Drowning in darkness should darken; here it purifies and illuminates.
The knot unties through a pun folded inside the paradox. Shyam is at once the colour dark and a name of Krishna. A heart sinking ever deeper into Shyam, into love of Krishna, is being cleansed, so of course it grows brighter. The contradiction was an appearance manufactured by the double sense, which is exactly what the alankar's name promises.
Cousins at Home and Abroad
Kabir's ulatbansi poems, the so-called upside-down utterances, push apparent contradiction to its mystical extreme: rain falling upward, the ant carrying the elephant. Some of those images resolve as virodhabhas once the spiritual key is supplied, while others are deliberate riddles meant to jam ordinary logic altogether. The sant poets understood that a contradiction the mind cannot file away keeps a listener awake.
English poetry keeps the same tools under different names: paradox for the resolvable clash of ideas, oxymoron for the compressed two-word version. Shakespeare has Romeo pile them up, feather of lead, cold fire, sick health, to dramatise love's confusion, and the Petrarchan tradition before him froze and burned in the same breath for two centuries. When you meet oxymoron in an English paper and virodhabhas in a Hindi one, you are meeting relatives.
How to Identify It in an Exam
Work the passage in three moves and write your answer in the same order:
Watch for the causation twins while you do this. Vibhavana, effect without cause, and vishesokti, cause without effect, are specialised paradoxes of cause and effect and carry their own names. If the clash in your passage is specifically between a karan and its karya, one of those labels beats the generic virodhabhas.
How to Use It in Your Own Poems
A paradox has to be earned. Written cold, 'her silence was deafening' is furniture; written after four lines that show a family talking over one absent chair, the same clash carries grief. Place your virodhabhas at a hinge, the turn of a sonnet, the last line of a free verse stanza, where the reader has enough context to perform the resolution without your help.
Then resist the urge to explain. The figure works because the reader closes the gap; a poet who closes it for them has done the crossword and handed over a filled grid. One resolved paradox per poem is usually plenty. If you want a live test of whether yours lands, Writory's monthly contest scores every entry on emotion and language among other things, and a clean virodhabhas is the sort of line that lifts both.
What poets can take from this
- Always run the resolution test first: a contradiction that dissolves is virodhabhas, one that stands is virodh.
- Quote the two clashing elements in your answer before naming the alankar.
- Check for cause and effect clashes separately, since vibhavana and vishesokti outrank the generic label.
- In your own writing, build context first and place the paradox at a turn or an ending.
- Never explain your paradox in the next line; trust the reader to close the gap.
- Collect real examples from Bihari and Kabir rather than memorising invented ones, because examiners favour the classics.
Try it yourself
Write a poem of ten to fourteen lines built around one apparent contradiction from ordinary life, such as a phone full of contacts and no one to call, or a fridge that got emptier as the family grew. Reveal the resolving sense only in the final two lines.
Questions
What is the difference between virodh and virodhabhas alankar?
In virodh alankar the opposition between two things is real and is stated as real; the poem means the conflict. In virodhabhas the opposition is only apparent, and a second sense or context dissolves it on reflection. The single test is whether the contradiction survives your best attempt to resolve it.
Is an oxymoron the same as virodhabhas?
They are close relatives rather than identical twins. An oxymoron is the compressed two-word form, like cold fire, while virodhabhas covers any statement whose contradiction is apparent rather than real, at whatever length. Many oxymorons qualify as virodhabhas once their intended sense resolves the clash.
How is virodhabhas different from vibhavana?
Vibhavana is a specialised figure where an effect occurs without its recognised cause, such as light without a lamp. Virodhabhas is the general figure of apparent contradiction of any kind. When the clash in a passage is specifically between cause and effect, name vibhavana or vishesokti rather than the broader label.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated September 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.