What Is Zeugma?
Quick answer: Zeugma is a figure of speech in which one word governs two others in different senses, as in Pope's counsel and tea. See how zeugma works with clear examples.
Zeugma is a figure of speech in which a single word, usually a verb, governs two or more other words while applying to each in a different sense. When Alexander Pope writes that Queen Anne does sometimes counsel take, and sometimes tea, the one verb take yokes an affair of state to a hot drink, and the comedy lives in the yoking. The word is Greek for exactly that: a yoking, as of two oxen to one plough.
The figure looks like a party trick, and it often is, but it is also one of the most efficient devices in the rhetorical toolbox. A good zeugma makes the reader do the work of noticing that one word is being used two ways at once, and that little jolt of participation is why the figure sticks in the memory. It can be pure comedy, it can be quiet devastation, and in the hands of the eighteenth century satirists it became a moral instrument: a way of exposing a world that weighs honour and brocade on the same scales.
The poem
Here thou, great Anna! whom three realms obey,
Dost sometimes counsel take, and sometimes tea.
Alexander Pope, 'The Rape of the Lock' (1714)
One yoke, two oxen
The mechanics are easy to see once pointed out. A governing word, most often a verb but sometimes a preposition or adjective, is stated once and then distributed across two or more objects. If the word means the same thing for each object, the sentence is merely economical. Zeugma proper happens when the senses diverge: the verb is literal with one object and figurative with the other, or shifts register entirely, as in the well-worn example of a man who took his hat and his leave.
The figure depends on the flexibility of the governing word. Verbs like take, hold, lose, catch, steal and break are zeugma magnets because English has stretched them across dozens of idioms; each idiom is a different sense waiting to be yoked to a literal one. The plough image in the Greek name is apt, because the two objects genuinely pull in different directions, and the sentence holds them in harness anyway.
How the trick works on the reader
Zeugma is a machine for producing a double-take. The reader processes the first pairing, verb plus object one, and settles on a sense; then object two arrives and forces an instant reinterpretation of the same verb. That silent re-reading is the pleasure. Unlike a stated joke, the zeugma never explains itself; it trusts the reader to catch the swerve, and readers reward writing that trusts them.
The device also compresses. To say that a departing guest collected his hat and also ended his visit takes a sentence and a half; the zeugma does it in six words, with a smile included at no extra charge. That economy is why the figure thrives in aphorism, satire and song lyrics, forms where every syllable pays rent. Poets grading their own drafts might note that this is precisely the sort of language use that impresses judges scoring for language and creativity: one word made to do two jobs, visibly and deliberately.
Zeugma or syllepsis? The terminology tangle
Anyone who reads two rhetoric handbooks will meet a contradiction. Some authorities call the different-senses figure syllepsis and reserve zeugma for a governing word that fits its objects unevenly or even ungrammatically; others define the terms the other way round; modern usage has largely collapsed the pair, with zeugma serving as the everyday name for the witty, two-senses figure. The confusion is centuries old and is not going to be resolved here or anywhere.
The practical advice is not to lose sleep. If you call Pope's counsel-and-tea line a zeugma, every modern reader and most editors will know exactly what you mean; if a classicist insists it is technically syllepsis, nod pleasantly and carry on. What matters at the desk is the effect, one governor, two senses, and the effect has been stable for two thousand years whatever name it wears.
The masters at work
The high period of English zeugma is the eighteenth century, and its laureate is Pope. The Rape of the Lock, his 1712 mock-epic about a stolen curl of hair, is practically built from the figure. Belinda is warned she might stain her honour or her new brocade, forget her prayers or miss a masquerade, or lose her heart or necklace at a ball. Each yoking is a moral X-ray: in Belinda's world, chastity and upholstery genuinely do sit on the same shelf, and the grammar says so before any narrator needs to.
The Victorians used the figure more gently. Dickens is regularly credited with sending a character off having taken his hat and his leave, and the pattern, one literal object, one idiomatic, became a staple of comic prose. The lesson from both centuries is the same: zeugma is at its best when the two yoked objects reveal something about the mind that paired them, whether that mind belongs to a vain society or a flustered gentleman at a doorstep.
Not just a joke: the serious zeugma
Because the figure runs on incongruity, writers assume it must be comic, but the swerve between senses can fall as easily as it can trip. Consider an original example: 'She left in a hired car and in silence; / she carried his child and his debts.' The doubled constructions still yoke unlike things, but the effect is weight, not wit. The reader performs the same double-take, and what they discover in the gap between senses is grief.
Serious zeugma works because it mimics how loss actually arrives, mixed in with logistics. People do leave in taxis and in tears; the figure simply refuses to pretend the two belong to different sentences. Used once at a poem's hinge, a grave zeugma can compress an entire situation into a line, which is why it deserves a place in the elegist's kit as well as the satirist's.
Writing zeugma that lands
Order is the first craft decision. Literal-then-figurative, hat before leave, reads as comedy, because the concrete sets a plain expectation the abstract then upends. Figurative-then-literal tends to read as deflation or pathos. Try the pair both ways aloud; the difference is never subtle. Second, keep the governor stated once only. Repeating the verb for the second object dissolves the yoke and with it the figure.
The pitfalls are few and avoidable. A strained pairing, where the verb barely fits one of its objects, makes readers stumble rather than smile; test each object against the verb separately before yoking them. And ration the device: one zeugma is wit, five in a page is a tic. The figure's charm is that of a card trick performed once, cleanly, and never explained.
What poets can take from this
- Build zeugmas around flexible verbs such as take, lose, hold, catch and break, which carry many idiomatic senses.
- State the governing word once only; repeating it for the second object destroys the yoke.
- Put the literal object first for comedy and the figurative first for pathos, and test both orders aloud.
- Check that the verb genuinely works with each object on its own before pairing them.
- Use at most one zeugma per poem or paragraph so the trick keeps its surprise.
- Let the two yoked objects characterise someone: what a mind pairs together is a portrait of that mind.
Try it yourself
Write a poem about a departure, a person leaving a house for the last time, in which every stanza ends with a zeugma, moving from comic pairings in the first stanza to devastating ones in the last.
Questions
Is zeugma the same as a pun?
They are cousins, not twins. A pun exploits two meanings of a word directly, often through sound; zeugma exploits two meanings structurally, by making one stated word govern two objects in different senses. Many zeugmas contain a pun on the governing verb, but the yoking construction is what defines the figure.
What is a simple example of zeugma in a sentence?
The classic is: he took his hat and his leave. The verb took is literal with the hat and idiomatic with the leave, and the single verb yoking both objects is what makes it zeugma. Pope's line about Queen Anne taking counsel and tea works identically.
Why do writers use zeugma?
For economy, surprise and characterisation. The figure compresses two statements into one, rewards the reader with a double-take, and quietly reveals values by what it pairs, as when Pope yokes a woman's honour to her brocade to satirise a society that prices them alike. In serious contexts it can compress grief the same way.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated September 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.