Shakespeare's Lost Years
Quick answer: What happened in Shakespeare's lost years, 1585 to 1592? The documented facts, the famous theories, and what seven silent years mean for working writers.
On 2 February 1585, the parish register at Stratford-upon-Avon records the baptism of twins, Hamnet and Judith, children of William Shakespeare, a glover's son who had married Anne Hathaway three years earlier. Then the record goes quiet. For roughly seven years there is no reliable documentary trace of him anywhere: no letters, no legal filings, no theatre records, nothing. When he surfaces again, in London in 1592, he is visible for the strangest of reasons: a rival writer is attacking him in print for being too successful.
Those seven undocumented years, 1585 to 1592, are known as the lost years, and they are the most argued-over blank space in English literature. Scholars have filled the gap with poachers, schoolmasters, soldiers, lawyers' clerks and horse-minders. What nobody disputes is what the gap produced: the silence ends with a fully formed professional dramatist. Somewhere inside those years, invisibly, the apprenticeship happened.
Seven years of silence
It helps to feel how low the starting point looks on paper. In 1585 Shakespeare is twenty, married at eighteen in circumstances that suggest urgency, since his first daughter Susanna was baptised six months after the wedding. He now has three children, a father whose fortunes as a Stratford glover and dealer had visibly declined, and no university education, no patron, no known profession. If you were betting in 1585 on which Englishman would reshape world literature, nothing in the visible record points to him.
That is roughly the position of most writers at the start: obligations, no credentials, no audience, and years of unglamorous work ahead that nobody will document because nobody is watching. The lost years are not an anomaly in a writer's life. They are the normal condition of one, preserved in its purest form because the writer happened to become Shakespeare.
What the record actually shows
The hard facts are few and worth stating plainly. Baptism at Stratford in April 1564. Marriage licence with Anne Hathaway, November 1582. Susanna baptised May 1583, the twins in February 1585. After that, the next secure sighting is September 1592, when the London writer Robert Greene, dying and bitter, published an attack in a pamphlet known as Greene's Groats-worth of Wit, sneering at an actor turned playwright as an upstart crow beautified with the feathers of university men.
The insult parodies a line from Henry VI, which tells us two things at once: by 1592 Shakespeare had written plays successful enough to be recognised from a twisted quotation, and his rise annoyed the educated professionals he had overtaken. You do not attack a nobody. The seven silent years had turned a provincial glover's son into a competitor worth resenting.
The theories: poacher, schoolmaster, player
The gap invited legends early, and it is honest to label them as legends. Nicholas Rowe, writing Shakespeare's first biography in 1709, over ninety years after the fact, passed on the story that young William poached deer from Sir Thomas Lucy's estate at Charlecote and fled Stratford to escape prosecution. It is colourful, unverifiable, and treated by most modern scholars as folklore. Another tradition has him minding horses outside London playhouses before working his way indoors, which is likewise unproven.
More seriously regarded is the note by the seventeenth-century gossip John Aubrey, drawing on the son of an actor who had worked with Shakespeare's company, that he had been in his younger years a schoolmaster in the country. Separately, some scholars have connected him to a William Shakeshafte named in the 1581 will of Alexander Hoghton, a Catholic gentleman in Lancashire, though the name was common in the region and the identification remains contested. The plainest guess is also the least romantic: at some point he attached himself to a touring or London acting company and learned the trade from inside, as actor first, patcher of scripts second, playwright third.
The insult that proves the apprenticeship
Greene's attack is the single most valuable document in the whole story, precisely because it is hostile. Flattery can be bought; resentment is evidence. For Greene, a Cambridge man, the outrage was that a mere player, without a university degree, presumed to write blank verse in competition with his betters and was winning. The pamphlet even warned fellow playwrights against trusting actors, those puppets who spoke the words scholars wrote.
Read as data, the insult tells us the lost years were spent learning two crafts, acting and writing, to a professional standard, in a brutally competitive commercial theatre. However he got there, Shakespeare emerged from the silence not as a promising beginner but as a working professional with produced plays. Nobody recorded the thousands of hours that took. Nobody ever records them.
What the silence teaches a working writer
First: the years when nothing is happening on paper are usually the years when everything is happening in fact. Between 1585 and 1592 Shakespeare read, watched, memorised, performed, imitated and failed in ways we will never recover, and the plays are the only receipt. If your own progress currently generates no external evidence, no acceptances, no prizes, no audience, that proves nothing about whether the apprenticeship is working. The evidence arrives late and all at once.
Second: he learned inside the medium, not adjacent to it. Whatever else the theories disagree on, Shakespeare clearly spent the lost years close to plays, as performer or hanger-on, absorbing stagecraft at the level of muscle memory. The equivalent for a poet is reading and writing inside the form daily, and putting work in front of real judges rather than waiting to feel ready. Feedback compresses lost years; that is much of the point of contests that score every entry, Writory's included, where a poem submitted by the 25th comes back with a verdict on the 30th instead of vanishing.
Reading early Shakespeare with the gap in mind
If you want to watch the apprenticeship surfacing, read the three Henry VI plays and Titus Andronicus, the work closest to the silence. They are uneven, loud, derivative of Marlowe in places, and full of a beginner's appetite for excess. Then read Richard III and feel the control arrive: the same materials, suddenly under command.
That visible jump inside the early canon may be the most encouraging thing Shakespeare left other writers. The greatest writer in the language has a discernible clumsy phase, and it survived in print. Yours is allowed too.
What poets can take from this
- Judge your progress by hours inside the craft, not by documented wins; the record always lags the work.
- Learn from within the medium: perform, submit, workshop, publish small, rather than only studying from a distance.
- Keep your early, uneven work; the jump between drafts is the proof the apprenticeship is happening.
- Treat hostile criticism as data about your visibility; nobody attacks a writer who threatens nothing.
- Imitate your Marlowes openly while learning; every mature style begins as managed influence.
- Refuse the timeline panic; seven silent years produced the most famous surfacing in literary history.
Try it yourself
Write a poem that covers seven undocumented years of a life in seven stanzas, one per year, where each stanza offers only a single small physical detail as evidence the person existed.
Questions
What are Shakespeare's lost years?
The term refers to the period from 1585, when his twins were baptised in Stratford, to 1592, when Robert Greene's pamphlet attacked him as an established London playwright. No reliable documentary evidence of his life survives from those seven years, so how he entered the theatre is unknown.
Was Shakespeare a schoolmaster during the lost years?
Possibly, but it is unproven. The claim comes from the seventeenth-century writer John Aubrey, who recorded that Shakespeare had been a schoolmaster in the country in his younger years, citing the son of an actor from Shakespeare's own company. Scholars take the note seriously without treating it as fact.
Why did Robert Greene call Shakespeare an upstart crow?
In his 1592 pamphlet, Greene mocked Shakespeare as an upstart crow beautified with others' feathers, an actor presuming to write plays in rivalry with university-educated playwrights. The attack parodied a line from Henry VI, which shows Shakespeare's plays were already well known by then.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated September 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.