How to Choose Your Strongest Poem for a Contest
Quick answer: Not sure which poem to enter? Use cold reads, peer picks and a judge-lens scorecard to choose your strongest poem for any poetry contest this month.
The poem you love most is rarely the poem a judge will love most. That sounds unfair, but there is a simple reason for it: you read your favourite poem with the memory of writing it. You supply the missing context, forgive the flat line in stanza two, and hear the rhythm you intended rather than the rhythm on the page. A judge has none of that. They meet your poem cold, once, in a stack of other poems, and it has perhaps thirty seconds to earn a slower second read.
So choosing your strongest contest entry is not a matter of taste or loyalty. It is a testing problem. You need methods that strip away your attachment and show you the poem as a stranger will see it. Three tests do this reliably: the cold read, the peer pick, and the judge-lens scorecard. Run all three and the same one or two poems usually rise to the top. This page walks you through each test and tells you what to do when they disagree.
Why attachment is not evidence
Writers consistently overrate poems that cost them something. The elegy you wrote the week your grandfather died, the piece that took forty drafts, the one that finally cracked a form you had been fighting for months: these carry emotional freight for you that never transfers to the page automatically. Sometimes it does transfer, and those poems are magnificent. Often it does not, and you are the last person able to tell the difference.
The reverse problem is just as common. Poets routinely dismiss a poem that arrived quickly, on the odd superstition that anything easy must be shallow. Plenty of celebrated poems were drafted in a sitting. Speed of composition tells you nothing about quality in either direction. The only honest question is what the poem does to a reader who owes you nothing, which is exactly what a contest judge is.
Test one: the cold read
Print your three or four candidate poems, put them in a drawer, and do not look at them for at least a week; two is better. Then read them in one sitting, aloud, in a random order, ideally somewhere you do not usually write. The delay matters because it degrades your memory of intention. You start to meet the lines as text rather than as transcripts of what you meant.
As you read, mark only two things: the moment your attention snagged with pleasure, and the moment it drifted. Do not fix anything yet. A poem with three snags and no drifts beats a poem with one dazzling snag and two drifts, because a judge reading forty entries in an evening will not push through the drifts. If you can bear it, record yourself reading each poem and listen back a day later. Your ear catches padding that your eye excuses.
Test two: the peer pick
Hand the same candidates to two or three readers whose taste you trust, and ask one narrow question: which poem would you enter, and which single line made you decide? Do not ask whether they liked the poems. People are polite, and 'I liked it' is useless data. The forced choice plus the line citation gives you something concrete: if two readers independently pick the same poem and quote the same line, that poem has a genuine centre of gravity.
Choose readers who actually read poetry, not just people who love you. A workshop partner, a teacher, a friend from an online critique group. If your readers split evenly, look at which poem provoked the more specific comments. Vague praise usually means the poem slid past the reader; specific objections mean it got under their skin, and a poem that gets under the skin is closer to contest-ready than one that merely pleases.
Test three: score it like a judge
Most serious contests score on a small set of criteria. Writory's judges, for instance, score every entry on creativity, emotion, structure, language and theme, and every entrant sees their score after results. You can borrow that frame before you submit. Give each candidate poem a mark out of ten in each of the five areas, on separate days if possible so the marks do not contaminate each other.
Be brutally literal about what each word means. Creativity: does the poem do anything a hundred other poems on this subject would not do? Emotion: does it make a stranger feel something, or does it merely report that you felt something? Structure: does the shape, the stanza logic, the ending, feel chosen rather than accidental? Language: are the verbs alive, the images exact, the clichés gone? Theme: does the poem know what it is about, and does it honour the contest theme if there is one? A poem scoring seven across the board will usually place higher than a poem with two tens and three fours, because judges reward wholeness.
Contest-ready versus workshop-ready
Some poems are good but not finished, and a contest is an expensive place to find that out. A workshop-ready poem has a strong premise and several fine lines but still contains a stanza you secretly skim, an ending you are not sure of, or a title that is just a label. A contest-ready poem survives the skim test: every stanza pays rent, the ending lands with either a click or an opening-out, and the title does work before the first line begins.
The quickest check is the deletion test. Try cutting each stanza in turn and reading the poem without it. If the poem survives the cut comfortably, the stanza was decoration and the poem is not finished. Judges feel loose stanzas even when they cannot name them; the poem reads a beat too long, and in a close field a beat too long is the whole game.
Mistakes that quietly cost entries
The most common selection error is entering the newest poem. New poems glow for about a fortnight because you are still inside them. Enter poems that are at least a month old and have survived a cold read. The second error is entering the most technically ambitious poem, the sestina or the golden shovel, on the theory that difficulty impresses. Judges reward the poem that works, not the poem that shows effort; an immaculate free-verse piece beats a limping villanelle every time.
The third error is ignoring the theme. If a contest names a theme, a brilliant off-theme poem loses to a good on-theme one, because theme fit is usually a scored criterion. And the fourth is length vanity: maximum line limits are ceilings, not targets. A tight eighteen-line poem often reads as more complete than a forty-line poem that wanders.
Your next seven days
Pick your four best candidates today and put them away. On day five, do the cold read and cut the field to two. On day six, send both to two trusted readers with the forced-choice question. On day seven, run the five-criteria scorecard on whichever poem survived. If it scores at least six in every column, it is your entry. If it fails one column badly, you have found your revision task, which is worth more than a hasty submission. Either way, you end the week knowing your strongest poem instead of guessing at it.
What poets can take from this
- Let a poem rest at least two weeks before judging whether it is contest-worthy.
- Read candidates aloud in random order; your ear finds drift that your eye forgives.
- Ask readers for a forced choice and a quoted line, never a polite rating.
- Score each candidate on creativity, emotion, structure, language and theme, and favour the balanced poem.
- Run the deletion test on every stanza; anything the poem survives without should go.
- Never enter a poem younger than a month; new poems glow falsely.
Try it yourself
Take two of your own poems on a similar subject and write a third poem that steals the strongest single line from each. Let the borrowed lines argue with each other until the new poem finds its own ending.
Questions
Should I enter my newest poem in a contest?
Usually not. Poems feel strongest in the first fortnight after drafting because you still supply the missing context yourself. Wait at least a month, run a cold read, and only enter it if it survives being met as a stranger would meet it.
Is it better to enter a formal poem or free verse?
Judges reward execution, not ambition. A fully realised free-verse poem beats a strained sonnet, and a flawless sonnet beats loose free verse. Enter whichever poem is most completely itself, regardless of form.
What if my trusted readers disagree about which poem is strongest?
Look at the quality of their reasons rather than the vote count. The poem that drew specific, line-level comments, even critical ones, usually has more life in it than the one that earned vague approval. Specificity of response is the real signal.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated September 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.