Monthly Poetry Contests With Cash Prizes
Quick answer: Monthly poetry contests with cash prizes compared: where genuine recurring competitions run, what they pay, and how to build a monthly submission rhythm.
Most famous poetry prizes run once a year, which means a poet who wants regular deadlines and regular chances at prize money has to look somewhere else entirely: at the smaller, faster ecosystem of monthly contests. These live mostly on writing platforms and in online communities rather than in print institutions. The prizes are more modest than the annual giants, but they recur twelve times a year, and for a developing poet that rhythm is often worth more than one distant jackpot.
The catch is that the monthly contest space is uneven. It contains honest competitions with named criteria and published winners, and it contains schemes built to sell anthologies or harvest votes. This page maps the categories that genuinely exist, explains what a good monthly cycle looks like from the inside, and gives you a checklist for telling the two kinds apart before you spend a rupee, dollar or pound.
The straight answer
Genuine monthly poetry contests with cash prizes exist, but they are a platform phenomenon, not a print one. Traditional magazines and societies run annual or quarterly prizes because judging costs time and money. Platforms can run monthly cycles because their submission, judging and results systems are built for repetition.
Expect the money to be smaller and steadier: prize pools typically sit in the tens to low hundreds of dollars, or the equivalent in rupees or pounds, rather than the five-figure sums of annual competitions. What you gain instead is frequency, faster results, and in the better contests, feedback. A poet entering a well-run monthly contest all year gets twelve deadlines, twelve verdicts and a growing sense of how their work lands with judges. That education is the real prize, and it compounds.
Where the monthly contests actually are
Four categories cover nearly everything you will find. Learn the categories rather than chasing individual names, because monthly contests appear and vanish faster than annual ones.
Writory sits in the first category and is a useful anchor for what the model looks like when it is transparent: entries open the 1st to the 25th of every month, results arrive on the 30th, every single entrant receives a score, and a free entry option is available each month alongside paid entries. Whatever monthly contest you choose, hold it to that standard of visible mechanics.
Why a monthly rhythm helps your writing
A deadline every month does something an annual deadline cannot: it forces finishing. Many poets draft endlessly and polish rarely, and a recurring contest converts drafts into completed, submitted poems on a schedule. Over a year that is twelve finished pieces, which is a real portfolio, whatever the results.
There is also a quieter benefit. Entering monthly teaches you to separate your identity from any single poem's fate. When the next deadline is thirty days away, a loss stings for an afternoon instead of a season. Poets who only enter one big prize a year tend to over-invest in one poem and stop writing while they wait. Monthly entrants keep moving, and movement is where improvement lives.
How to compete well month after month
The most common mistake in monthly contests is recycling: sending the same poem, lightly retitled, into every theme. Judges notice, and more importantly the practice teaches you nothing. Write toward each month's theme or occasion freshly, even if you draw on an old draft's material.
Study how the contest scores. Many transparent competitions judge on a handful of named qualities, creativity, emotional effect, structure, language and fit to theme are the usual five, and a poem that is strong on four of them will usually beat a poem that is dazzling on one. Between cycles, revise the poems that scored mid-table rather than mourning them; a poem that placed nowhere in March, rebuilt, is often your strongest entry in June. Keep the winning poems from each month in a folder and reread them quarterly. Patterns will surface: endings that land on images, openings that skip throat-clearing, titles that do work.
Reading a monthly contest before you trust it
Before entering any recurring contest, spend ten minutes on due diligence. You are checking for transparency, because transparency is expensive to fake month after month.
If a contest passes these checks, its size matters much less than its honesty. A fifty-dollar prize from an organisation that publishes everything openly beats a five-hundred-dollar promise from one that publishes nothing.
Traps and time-wasters
Three schemes dominate the shady end of this space. Popularity-vote contests award prizes to whoever drags the most friends to a voting page, which measures your social reach and teaches you nothing about poems; some also harvest the voters' contact details, which is the actual business. Anthology monthlies declare nearly everyone a 'selected poet' and then sell the anthology back to entrants at a painful price. And feedback-upsell contests are free to enter but charge to see your score or 'judge's comments', reversing the honest model where feedback is part of what your entry already bought.
None of these are illegal, exactly. All of them waste the two things a developing poet cannot spare: money and morale.
A realistic first step
In the next seven days, choose one monthly contest that passes the transparency checklist above and commit to entering it for three consecutive months, not one. One month tells you nothing; three months gives you comparative results and a visible trend. Draft this month's poem in the first week, leave it alone for a few days, revise once, and enter before the final-day rush. Then put next month's opening date in your calendar. The poets who benefit from monthly contests are the ones who treat them as a practice, not a raffle.
What poets can take from this
- Enter early in the window, not on deadline day, so a technical problem cannot cost you the month.
- Write a new poem for each cycle rather than recycling one piece across themes.
- Track your scores or placements in a spreadsheet; three months of data beats any single result.
- Read every winning poem the month it is published and note one concrete thing it does well.
- Set a fixed monthly budget for entries and stop when it is spent, whatever the temptation.
- Treat a mid-table month as revision homework, not rejection.
Try it yourself
Write a poem structured around the days of a month, using three dated moments, one near the 1st, one mid-month, one on the 30th, and let what changes between the dates carry the poem's real story.
Questions
Are monthly poetry contests worth entering?
For a developing poet, often more than annual ones, because twelve deadlines a year build a finishing habit and give you comparative feedback that a single annual entry never can. The prizes are smaller, so enter for the practice and the record, and treat any cash as a bonus. Choose contests that publish winners, dates and judging criteria openly.
How much do monthly poetry contests pay?
Typical prize pools sit in the tens to low hundreds of dollars, or the equivalent in other currencies, far below annual competitions but paid twelve times a year. Amounts vary by platform and change over time, so check the current month's page rather than relying on old listings. Some contests also give every entrant a score or short feedback, which has real value beyond the money.
How can I tell if a recurring poetry contest is legitimate?
Look for published past winners you can actually read, named judging criteria, fixed monthly dates that are kept, and a plain statement that rights stay with the poet. Be wary of contests decided by public voting, contests that sell anthologies to entrants, and contests that charge extra to reveal your results.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated September 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.