Lord Arthur Savile's Crime by Oscar Wilde
Quick answer: Lord Arthur Savile's Crime by Oscar Wilde: full summary with the ending, the palm reading, the failed murders, and the satire behind Wilde's comedy of duty.
At a fashionable London party, a society palm reader looks at a young aristocrat's hand and goes pale: written there, he privately reveals, is murder. Lord Arthur Savile, engaged to be married and a man of high principle, draws the only conclusion a gentleman can: the murder must be got through before the wedding. Lord Arthur Savile's Crime appeared serially in 1887 and became the title story of Wilde's 1891 collection, subtitled A Study of Duty.
It is the longest and most sustained comic story Wilde wrote, a satire that aims at fate, conscience and fashionable society all at once. Students get asked about its irony and its subtitle; writers should study how Wilde keeps an absurd premise upright for forty pages by letting his hero take it with perfect seriousness.
The story in brief
At Lady Windermere's reception, her pet cheiromantist Mr Septimus Podgers reads palms for the amusement of duchesses. When he takes Lord Arthur Savile's hand he falters, and later, pressed and paid, tells the young man what he saw: Lord Arthur is destined to commit a murder. Arthur walks the night streets in horror, but his logic soon settles into Wilde's great joke: since the murder is fated, and since it would be dishonourable to marry his beloved Sybil Merton with the deed still hanging over their future, duty demands he commit it promptly and get it behind him. He postpones the wedding and selects a victim with the diligence of a man doing something responsible: his elderly relative Lady Clementina Beauchamp, who suffers from heartburn. He supplies her with a capsule of aconitine disguised as a remedy, to be taken when the next attack comes, and leaves for Venice to wait. Lady Clementina duly dies, and Arthur returns, dutiful and content, only to discover among the effects she left him the pill box, capsule untouched: she died of natural causes, and he has murdered no one.
He tries again. Through a genial anarchist, Herr Winckelkopf, he procures an explosive clock and posts it to his relative the Dean of Chichester. The device fizzles harmlessly; the Dean's household adopt it as an amusing toy that produces little puffs of smoke, as reported in a delighted family letter. Arthur despairs of fulfilling his destiny until, walking by the Thames late one night, he sees Podgers himself leaning on the parapet. He seizes the cheiromantist by the legs and tips him into the river. The body is found; the verdict is misadventure; the prophecy is fulfilled by its own prophet. Arthur marries Sybil and lives in complete happiness. Years later Lady Windermere tells him Podgers was a fraud who never read a true palm in his life, and Arthur, unshaken, replies that he owes cheiromancy all the happiness of his life, above all Sybil. The subtitle's joke completes itself: a study of duty, discharged.
The characters
Wilde populates the story thinly on purpose: everyone exists to keep the premise perfectly straight-faced.
Themes and meaning
For exams: the satire of superstition and of society's appetite for it; determinism versus free will, since the prophecy causes the only crime it predicted; and the subtitle's target, a Victorian cult of duty so procedural that it can digest murder once murder is framed as an obligation. Conscience, Wilde shows, attaches itself to whatever the mind has accepted as required, and Arthur suffers more anxiety about delay than about killing. The story also mocks moral bookkeeping: Arthur chooses victims by minimising inconvenience, sends flowers, and feels the glow of a task well done.
The sharper observation is the loop at the centre: this is a self-fulfilling prophecy played as farce. Podgers invents a murder, and the invention manufactures its own murderer and its own corpse, his. Oedipus works the same circuit as tragedy; Wilde runs it as comedy of manners and lets nobody notice, least of all Arthur, whose serene closing gratitude to cheiromancy is the punchline. Free will never enters the story because its hero never once thinks to question the assignment.
The craft: farce with a straight face
The controlling technique is total earnestness inside an absurd frame. The narration adopts Arthur's own gravity, murder is discussed in the vocabulary of duty, sacrifice and self-denial, and no character ever winks. Comedy of this kind dies the moment the prose admits it is joking; Wilde's sentences stay elegant and serious, and the reader supplies all the laughter. If you write satire, this is the dial to study: state the monstrous premise in the ethical language of your hero, and never audibly disagree with him.
Structurally, it is a three-attempt escalation with a reversed target. Two failures teach the reader the rules, fate will not be hurried by poison or clockwork, so the third attempt must change something, and what changes is the victim: the prophecy is completed by consuming the prophet. The failed murders also do quiet double duty as characterisation, each chosen victim elderly, distant and 'convenient', keeping Arthur likeable by keeping his competence low. Try plotting a comic story as attempt, attempt, inversion, and see how much narrative energy the pattern releases.
What poets can take from this
- For exams, lead with the subtitle: A Study of Duty signals that the satire's target is Victorian moral obligation, not the supernatural.
- Explain the self-fulfilling prophecy loop: Podgers's fraudulent prediction creates the murder, and the murdered man is Podgers.
- Cite the two failed attempts, the untouched aconitine capsule and the explosive clock turned nursery toy, as Wilde deflating melodrama with domestic comedy.
- As a writer, keep your satire's narrator perfectly straight-faced; let the hero's earnest moral vocabulary carry the joke unassisted.
- Use the attempt, attempt, inversion structure: two failures establish the rules, the third breaks them by changing the target.
- Note how Wilde keeps a murderer sympathetic: low competence, absurd sincerity, and victims kept carefully abstract.
Try it yourself
Write a story in which a character receives a fraudulent prediction and, by acting dutifully on it, makes it come true at the predictor's expense. The protagonist must treat every step as a moral obligation, and the narration must never once acknowledge the absurdity.
Questions
What happens at the end of Lord Arthur Savile's Crime?
After his poison and bomb attempts fail comically, Arthur finds Podgers by the Thames at night and pushes him into the river; the death is ruled misadventure. Freed of his destiny, he marries Sybil and is perfectly happy. Lady Windermere later reveals Podgers was a fraud, but Arthur declares he owes cheiromancy all his happiness.
What is the irony in Lord Arthur Savile's Crime?
The prophecy is a fraud, yet it causes the very murder it predicted, and the victim is the man who invented it. A further layer: Arthur commits murder out of moral duty to his future wife, and is rewarded with unclouded happiness, while the story's subtitle solemnly calls the whole affair a study of duty.
Why does Lord Arthur decide to commit a murder before his wedding?
Podgers tells him murder is written in his palm. Believing the deed inevitable, Arthur reasons that marrying Sybil with the crime still ahead would be unfair to her, so honour requires him to complete his destiny first. Wilde plays the logic completely straight, which is the story's central joke.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the August contest and have your own poem read and scored.