Master and Man by Leo Tolstoy
Quick answer: Master and Man by Tolstoy: full summary with the ending, Vasili and Nikita in the blizzard, themes of greed and sacrifice, and the craft of the snowstorm tale.
A merchant so hungry for a bargain that he cannot wait out a blizzard drives into the snow with his peasant labourer, and only one of them will drive out. Leo Tolstoy published Master and Man in 1895, three decades after War and Peace, and it distils his late obsessions, property, death and the sudden possibility of goodness, into one freezing night on the steppe.
The story runs longer than his parables and shorter than his novellas, and it is often called the most perfect thing he wrote after Anna Karenina. Students need its plot and themes; the ending transforms both. Writers should read it for the weather: no one in literature uses a storm harder, as obstacle, as clock, and finally as the blank page on which a man's real accounts are settled.
The story in brief, ending included
Vasili Andreevich Brekhunov, merchant and church elder of a small town, has a chance to buy a grove of timber cheap, and fears a rival will get there first. The day after a feast, with a storm rising, he sets out in a light sledge, taking his labourer Nikita, a gentle, hard used man who drinks no longer, is cheated by his master on wages, and accepts it all with a kind of workmanlike patience. They lose the road almost at once. Twice they blunder to the village of Grishkino, and twice Vasili refuses the offered warm night, because the bargain will not wait. Deeper in the dark they lose the road for good and dig in beside a ravine: horse unharnessed, sledge for a windbreak, snow to the waist. Nikita settles to endure. Vasili smokes, counts his money, and cannot bear it: he takes the horse, abandons Nikita, and rides off alone to save himself.
The horse flounders in drifts and carries him in a circle, back to the sledge, where Nikita is already dying of cold. And then comes the turn nobody in the story could have predicted, least of all Vasili. Almost without deciding, he opens his fur coat and lies down on top of Nikita, covering the freezing man with his own warmth and body. Joy such as he has never felt floods him. Through the night he dreams and half wakes, feels his legs freeze, understands that he is dying, and understands, in Tolstoy's astonishing final logic, that Nikita's life going on is his own life. In the morning peasants dig them out: Vasili is dead, frozen over the living Nikita, who survives with frostbitten toes and lives another twenty years, dying at home under the icons with a candle in his hands. The grove, the money and the rival are never mentioned again.
The characters
Two men and a horse carry the story, and Tolstoy gives the horse nearly equal narrative dignity.
Themes and meaning
The exam themes: greed against human solidarity, the master and servant relation inverted by death, redemption through a single selfless act, and nature's indifference to social rank. The storm does not know Vasili is a church elder with three thousand roubles in his pocket. Note the class economics Tolstoy plants early, Vasili underpays Nikita and settles wages in marked up shop goods, so that the final scene literally reverses the story's opening arithmetic: the man who spent his life taking warmth from Nikita ends it giving all of his own.
The sharper reading concerns how the redemption happens. Vasili does not repent, reason or pray his way to the sacrifice; he acts first and understands afterwards, and Tolstoy is explicit that the joy arrives with the act, not before it. This is late Tolstoy's whole moral psychology in one scene: goodness is not a conclusion you reach but a thing your body can suddenly do, and meaning follows conduct. It is also worth saying plainly that the story refuses to punish Nikita for his master's sins or reward Vasili with survival; grace, here, costs exactly one life and is worth it.
The craft: the circle in the snow
Structurally the story is built on repetition with rising stakes: twice lost, twice at Grishkino, twice the choice to push on, then the third loss that cannot be undone. The circling is literal, the horse keeps returning Vasili to the sledge, and thematic, since every attempt to escape the human obligation delivers him straight back to it. When your plot needs to feel like fate without any supernatural machinery, this is the tool: let geography, weather and animal instinct conspire to return the character to the one thing he is fleeing.
The other technique worth stealing is Tolstoy's thermal realism. Cold is tracked on the body in exact increments, fingers, toes, the frozen coat collar, so that when the redemptive act comes it is measured in the same units: Vasili's warmth, transferred, is not a metaphor but calories. Grounding a transcendent moment in physical bookkeeping is what keeps it from sentimentality, and it is the kind of concrete emotional writing that scores under Emotional Impact in a rubric like Writory's Short Story Contest.
Reading it against Ivan Ilyich
Master and Man makes an ideal pairing with The Death of Ivan Ilyich, written nine years earlier. Both give a self satisfied man an unwanted appointment with death; both end in a flood of light and release. The difference is speed and instrument: Ivan needs months of agony and a screaming interrogation of his whole life, while Vasili is converted in one bodily movement that takes seconds. Essays that argue the later story shows Tolstoy trusting action over introspection almost write themselves, and the texts support it.
What poets can take from this
- For exams, track the two refusals at Grishkino; they prove the catastrophe was chosen, which sharpens every theme.
- Contrast the opening wage arithmetic with the closing gift of body heat: the story's moral is an inverted transaction.
- Name the horse Mukhorty in your answer; examiners notice students who register how Tolstoy dignifies the animal.
- Writers: use repetition with rising stakes, twice recoverable, third time fatal, to make a plot feel like fate.
- Track a physical quantity, cold, hunger, blood, in exact increments so your climax can pay off in the same units.
- Let a redemptive act precede the character's understanding of it; explanation after action reads truer than resolve before it.
Try it yourself
Write a story in which two people of unequal power are trapped overnight by weather, and the one with power makes a run for safety that circles back, geographically and morally, to where they started. The turn must be an action taken before the character can explain it.
Questions
What happens at the end of Master and Man?
After abandoning Nikita and being carried in a circle back to the sledge, Vasili lies on top of the freezing man and warms him with his own body all night. Vasili dies of the cold, filled with unfamiliar joy; Nikita survives with frostbitten toes and lives about twenty more years.
Why does Vasili lie on Nikita to save him?
Tolstoy deliberately gives no calculated reason: Vasili acts almost before deciding, and the sense of joy and meaning follows the act. Dying, he feels that Nikita's continued life is his own. The story argues that goodness arrives as action first and understanding second.
What is the main theme of Master and Man?
Greed and rank against simple human solidarity. Vasili risks two lives for a timber bargain and cheats Nikita on wages, yet in the storm the master and man relation dissolves, and Vasili's one act of sacrifice reverses and redeems the whole ledger of his life.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the August contest and have your own poem read and scored.