Conflict
Quick answer: Conflict in fiction: the collision between want and resistance that makes stories move, the classic types, a London example, and how to escalate by cost.
Conflict is the collision between what a character wants and whatever resists it: another person, a society, a snowstorm, or the character's own divided heart. In other words, it is want plus obstacle, and fiction is the record of that arithmetic working itself out.
The oldest sentence in the workshop, no conflict, no story, survives because it keeps being true, even for quiet fiction, where the collisions are simply smaller and better mannered. Conflict is a first-principles concern: it belongs to conception, before plot, before structure, because it is the thing plot and structure exist to organise.
One man against the cold
Jack London's To Build a Fire strips conflict to a laboratory case. A man travels a Yukon trail at seventy-five below zero; he wants to reach camp, and the cold wants nothing at all, which is exactly what makes it terrifying. Every event is the collision restated: wet feet, numb fingers, the fire built under the wrong tree, snow sliding off a branch onto the flame. There is no villain, no argument, no second speaking character except a dog, yet the story is nothing but conflict from first line to last.
Notice what London adds to make the collision a story: the man's arrogance. He was warned not to travel alone, and dismissed the warning. That converts the tale from weather report to judgment, because the exterior conflict with the cold is braided to an interior one, pride against evidence. The strongest fiction almost always runs the two strands together.
The classic types, and their limits
The schoolroom list still serves as a rough map of where resistance can come from.
Treat the list as diagnostic, not architectural: readers never experience types, only a particular person straining against a particular wall. The taxonomy's one real use is spotting monoculture, a draft where every collision is the same kind, and every scene therefore tastes the same.
Making collisions that escalate
Specify both sides. A vague want meeting a vague obstacle produces vague pages; a named want, to keep the farm through winter, meeting a named resistance, a brother with the deed and a buyer waiting, produces scenes that write themselves. Then escalate by cost rather than volume: each round of the collision should be more expensive to lose than the last, which is different from being louder.
Give the resistance intelligence wherever possible; an obstacle that adapts, a rival who counters, presses far harder than a fixed wall. The trap is obstacle soup, the draft that piles up unrelated difficulties, traffic, weather, a lost phone, none of which touch the central want. Resistance that does not press on the want is inconvenience, and inconvenience is not conflict. Judges scoring Storytelling and Structure consistently reward the single pressed collision over the crowded, unpressed many.
Conflict under good manners
The collision does not need to raise its voice. Kazuo Ishiguro's The Remains of the Day stages one of modern fiction's fiercest conflicts almost entirely through professional courtesy: a butler's want, dignity through perfect service, collides with the love and the moral clarity that service requires him to suppress, and the battles are fought in pantry conversations about staffing. Nobody shouts. The want and the resistance are simply enormous and permanently engaged, which is all conflict has ever required.
Quiet conflict makes special demands on precision. Because the surface is calm, the reader must be able to feel exactly what is at stake under each polite exchange, so the writer has to establish the want early and keep its pressure legible in small behaviours: what a character will not look at, which questions they answer a beat too slowly. The reward is proportional: when the collision finally surfaces, even one sentence of directness lands like a blow, because the story has taught the reader what such a sentence costs.
Conflict, tension and stakes
The three words travel together and do different jobs. Conflict is the collision on the page, want against resistance, a fact of the story's world. Tension is the reader's answering strain, the felt charge the collision generates when it is made to matter. Stakes are the price of losing, the answer to the reader's constant quiet question, or what. A draft can hold all the conflict in the world and generate no tension because the stakes were never made real; that diagnosis, conflict present, stakes absent, explains more dead manuscripts than any other single sentence an editor can write.
What poets can take from this
- Name the want and the resistance in one sentence before drafting a scene.
- Braid an exterior collision with an interior one; each makes the other matter.
- Escalate by cost, not volume; the next round must be more expensive, not louder.
- Give resistance intelligence where you can; adapting obstacles press hardest.
- Cut inconveniences that never touch the central want; they are noise, not conflict.
Try it yourself
Write a story in which two siblings want the same single object from their late parent's house, for reasons neither will say aloud. The story must contain no raised voices, and the object must fit in one hand.
Questions
Can a story exist without conflict?
Sketches and mood pieces can, but stories move by collision. Even the quietest fiction runs on friction between wanting and having; remove it entirely and you have description, which can be beautiful and still is not story.
Does conflict mean argument or violence?
No. Conflict is want meeting resistance, and its loudness is a style choice. A silence at a dinner table can carry more collision than a gunfight, provided the want and the obstacle are real.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the August contest and have your own poem read and scored.