Experimental Fiction
Quick answer: Experimental fiction breaks the accepted rules of narrative form, from Tristram Shandy to House of Leaves. Learn what counts, why it works, and how to try it.
Experimental fiction is writing that deliberately breaks the accepted conventions of narrative form, structure, language, or the physical page, and makes that breakage part of the meaning. In other words, it is fiction where how the story is told is as much the subject as what happens in it. The label is relative by nature: yesterday's experiment, the stream of consciousness, the unreliable narrator, is today's standard equipment.
The tradition is older than most readers assume, and it lives at every level of the writing world, from avant-garde small presses to bestselling novels with unconventional bones. For a working writer, the term matters most at the design stage: an experiment is a formal decision made before drafting, chosen because the story cannot be told properly any other way.
Three centuries of rule-breaking
Laurence Sterne's 'Tristram Shandy' (1759) was doing almost everything postmodernism later claimed to invent: a narrator who cannot get himself born until volume three, a black page mourning a character, a marbled page, chapters out of order, direct arguments with the reader. Sterne proves an essential point, that formal play is not a modern disease but one of the novel's founding pleasures. James Joyce's 'Ulysses' (1922) made the experiment linguistic, giving each episode its own style, from newspaper headlines to catechism, so that the prose itself keeps changing costume around one ordinary Dublin day.
Mark Z. Danielewski's 'House of Leaves' (2000) shows the physical-page branch alive and selling: a horror story told through nested manuscripts, footnotes that spiral into labyrinths, and typography that forces the reader to rotate the book as the characters lose their bearings inside an impossible house. In all three cases the trick earns its keep because form mirrors subject. The maze on the page is the maze in the story.
Why experiment, and what it costs
The honest reason to break form is that some experiences resist conventional telling. Grief loops; memory fragments; obsession footnotes itself. A linear, past-tense, third-person account flattens those textures, and a formal experiment can render them directly, letting the reader feel disorientation rather than read about it. Experiment also refreshes attention: a reader forced to work assembles the story personally and invests accordingly.
The costs arrive just as reliably. Difficulty taxes readers, and they pay only if the story underneath rewards them; an experiment wrapped around a hollow centre is the most disliked object in publishing. There is also the seduction of novelty for its own sake. Editors see hundreds of second-person fragmented narratives whose form was chosen for decoration, and they can tell within a page whether the device is structural or cosmetic. The test never changes: would this story lose something essential if told conventionally? If the answer is no, the experiment is costume.
Running an experiment at short story length
The short story is the ideal laboratory, because a reader will grant you twenty minutes of strangeness more readily than four hundred pages of it. Choose the constraint or device first and state it to yourself in one sentence: told backwards, told as a series of complaint letters, told in second person, told in footnotes to a recipe. Then make sure the device carries information the story needs. A story told backwards should be about consequence and cause; a story in complaint letters should be about what complaint letters conceal.
Keep everything else classical. One experiment per story is nearly always the right dose; stack three and the reader has no stable ground to stand on. The trap to avoid is hiding the story. However bold the form, the reader still needs a person who wants something, resistance, and change, and the experimental stories that win contests are the ones where a judge can score Storytelling and Structure highly precisely because the wild form is doing structural work.
Experimental, absurdist, and literary: sorting the labels
Absurdist fiction breaks the world's logic while usually keeping conventional prose and structure; experimental fiction may keep the world entirely realistic while breaking the telling. Kafka is absurdist but formally rather traditional. 'House of Leaves' is experimental and its horrors half-explained. The two combine happily but are separate dials.
Literary fiction is the shelf where most experiments are sold, but the labels are not synonyms: plenty of literary fiction is formally conservative, and genre fiction runs experiments too, as any second-person interactive novel proves. Metafiction, fiction aware of its own fictionality, is one specific experiment among many, not the whole category.
What poets can take from this
- Choose the formal device before drafting and be able to state it in one sentence.
- Run one experiment per story; stacked devices cancel each other out.
- Make the form mirror the subject so the strangeness carries meaning.
- Keep character, desire, and change fully intact underneath the device.
- Test on a reader who dislikes experimental work; if the story still lands, it has earned its form.
Try it yourself
Write a story in the form of the index at the back of an unpublished memoir. Through alphabetised entries and their page references, let the reader reconstruct a marriage, a betrayal, and what the memoirist could not bring herself to put in the chapters.
Questions
Is experimental fiction the same as literary fiction?
No. Literary fiction is a market category defined by emphasis on character and prose, and much of it is formally conventional. Experimental fiction is defined by breaking narrative conventions, and it appears in genre work as well as on literary shelves.
Do contests and magazines accept experimental stories?
Most do, and many editors actively hunt for formal freshness. The consistent requirement is that the device serves a story a reader can feel; experiments that are all surface tend to stall at the first reading round.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the August contest and have your own poem read and scored.