Plotters and Pantsers
Quick answer: Plotters plan stories before drafting; pantsers write by the seat of their pants and discover the plot as they go. Learn both methods and the hybrid most writers use.
Plotters and pantsers are the writing world's shorthand for two opposed drafting temperaments: plotters plan a story before writing it, while pantsers write by the seat of their pants, discovering the plot as they draft. In other words, the terms describe when a writer does their structural thinking, before the prose or inside it. Neither is a method you choose so much as a leaning you discover.
The vocabulary lives in writing communities, craft books and the annual crowds of novel-in-a-month drafters who popularised it. It matters practically because advice that saves a plotter's book can kill a pantser's, and writers waste years obeying the wrong tribe's rules.
The two temperaments in the wild
George R.R. Martin's version of the split is the most quoted: architects, who blueprint the house before laying a foundation, and gardeners, who plant a seed and learn its shape by watering it. Stephen King describes himself as the second kind in On Writing, distrusting plotting and preferring to put characters in a situation and watch. At the other pole, thriller and mystery writers often plot in detail because their genres run on planted evidence and timed reveals; a whodunit drafted blind tends to need its clues installed backwards in revision anyway.
Both temperaments produce masterpieces and both produce wreckage. The plotter's failure mode is the lifeless book that executes an outline without discovering anything. The pantser's failure mode is the soggy middle and the unfixable draft, structure deferred until it becomes archaeology.
What each approach buys you
Plotting buys certainty and speed in the middle: you always know the next scene, foreshadowing can be planted on the first pass, and revision is lighter because the load-bearing walls were placed on purpose. Its cost is the risk of obedience, drafting toward an ending you have outgrown because the outline says so.
Pantsing buys aliveness: scenes surprise their writer, characters refuse instructions, and the prose carries the energy of genuine discovery. Its costs arrive later, in heavier revision and the occasional collapsed draft. For short stories the stakes shrink usefully, since a wrong turn costs an afternoon rather than a winter, which is why the short form is the safest laboratory for finding your own leaning.
Finding your own mix
Almost nobody is a pure case. The commonest working position is the plantser hybrid: know the beginning, the ending's general direction and a few landmark scenes, and pants the terrain between them. Some writers outline after drafting, reverse-engineering structure from a discovered draft. Others plot each scene just before writing it, keeping the plan one step ahead of the prose.
The way to find your mix is evidence, not identity. Draft one story from a full outline and one from a single image, then compare which draft was easier to finish and which was better once revised, because the answers can differ. The trap is treating the label as loyalty; the moment your method stops finishing stories, the method is wrong, whatever tribe it belongs to.
Where both camps meet: revision
Whatever the drafting method, revision demands the same structural honesty from everyone. The pantser's second act of discipline is the reverse outline, mapping the draft scene by scene to find what the improvisation actually built; the plotter's is the freshness audit, hunting the passages where obedience to the plan flattened the life out of a scene.
It helps to remember that readers cannot detect method. Nothing in a finished story announces whether its turns were engineered in advance or found in the dark, and no judge or editor scores process. The argument between the camps is really about which failure mode you would rather repair later, and revision is where both bills come due.
Some writers even migrate over a career, plotting more as deadlines tighten or pantsing more as confidence grows, and a method that served three books can quietly stop serving the fourth. Checking your process against your results every few projects is not fickleness; it is maintenance.
Neighbours and opposites
The distinction touches several nearby terms. Outlining is the plotter's core tool, with formats from single-page sketches to scene-by-scene documents like the Snowflake Method's expanding summaries. Discovery writing is the politer literary name for pantsing. The first draft is where the whole question lives, since by revision every writer must become a structural thinker. And neither camp escapes the same finish line: a story that reads as inevitable, however improvised its construction was.
What poets can take from this
- Test both temperaments on short stories before declaring allegiance.
- If you plot, permit the draft to override the outline when it knows better.
- If you pants, fix an ending image early; direction is not the same as a map.
- Watch where your drafts die and adjust the method, not the ambition.
- Steal freely across camps; plantsing is the industry's real majority position.
- Reassess your method every few projects; temperaments drift as skills grow.
Try it yourself
Write the same story premise twice in one week: once from a ten-point outline, once from nothing but an opening line. Compare the two drafts for energy, structure and how much you enjoyed the writing, then write one sentence stating what your actual method is.
Questions
Is it better to be a plotter or a pantser?
Neither is better; they trade different risks. Plotters risk lifeless execution, pantsers risk structural collapse, and most working writers settle on a hybrid that plans a little and discovers a lot.
What is a plantser?
A writer who combines both approaches, typically outlining a few fixed landmarks, the opening, the ending's direction, a midpoint, and drafting freely between them. It is probably the most common real-world method.
Can a pantser write a mystery?
Yes, but expect to install the clue architecture in revision, since fair-play mysteries depend on planted evidence and timing. Many mystery writers draft loose and then re-plot backwards from the solution.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the August contest and have your own poem read and scored.