How Do You Fix a Plot Hole?
Quick answer: How do you fix a plot hole? Diagnose which link broke, then patch, plant, restructure or cut. A repair hierarchy with tests, examples and revision tactics.
Fix a plot hole by first naming exactly which link broke, what established fact, rule, motive or piece of knowledge the story contradicts, then choosing the lightest repair that truly closes it. The repair hierarchy runs: plant (add an early line that makes the impossible possible), patch (adjust the contradicting scene), restructure (change the event order so the contradiction never forms), or cut (remove the element that created the debt). Most holes close with one planted sentence; the skill is finding which sentence.
Method matters because panic repairs create new holes. Writers discover a contradiction at midnight, bolt on an explanatory paragraph, and the explanation contradicts something else. Treating the fix as diagnosis before surgery keeps the repair smaller than the wound.
The longer answer: diagnose before you touch anything
Write the hole down as a contradiction with two halves: 'In scene A the story establishes X; in scene B the story requires not-X.' This formulation does half the work, because every repair is simply a choice of which half to change, or how to break the link between them. If you cannot state both halves, you may not have a hole at all, but an unanswered question, which needs silence honoured rather than surgery.
Then weigh what each half is load-bearing for. If X (the early fact) exists only to be interesting, changing it is cheap. If the climax stands on X, you must change B, the requiring scene. Check the blast radius before deciding: search the manuscript for every consequence of the half you intend to alter, because holes are rarely local. The half-hour spent listing dependencies is the difference between a stitch and a second wound.
The four repairs, with the tests for each
Each repair suits a different species of hole, and each has a test that tells you it worked.
Repairs in the wild
Published fiction is full of visible stitching, instructive because you can compare wound and repair. Arthur Conan Doyle, forced to resurrect Sherlock Holmes after killing him at the Reichenbach Falls, planted the solution backwards: 'The Adventure of the Empty House' (1903) retrofits an escape and an alibi for the missing years, a patch so large it is really a retcon, yet built carefully from the original scene's ambiguities, no body ever recovered. The lesson: even drastic repairs hold when they use materials the original story left lying around.
Working novelists mostly repair before publication, and their tool is the dependency list. When a mystery writer discovers the murderer could not have known the victim's route, the amateur fix is a paragraph of explanation at the reveal; the professional fix is one planted sentence in an early scene, a glance at an open diary, because explanations at the point of strain draw attention to it. Fix upstream, never at the site of the break; readers stare wherever the prose starts justifying itself.
Mistakes that make holes worse
The commonest failed repair is the explanation dump: a character pauses the climax to account for the contradiction, which converts a hole few would notice into a signpost all will read. Almost as common is lampshading used as apology, having a character joke about the implausibility. That works in comedy as a wink; in a story asking for belief, it is the author confessing without repairing.
Beware also the cascade: changing an early fact without tracing its dependencies, so the fix contradicts three later scenes. And know when to stop. A story rebuilt around its patches loses the shape that made it worth patching; sometimes the mature decision is that the hole is trivia, far from the story's heart, and the revision hours belong to the ending instead. For contest work on a deadline, that triage is the skill itself: close what the meaning stands on, log the rest, and submit the story whose last page works.
What poets can take from this
- State every hole as 'scene A establishes X, scene B requires not-X' before touching the draft.
- Prefer the upstream plant to the on-site explanation; readers stare at justifying prose.
- Trace dependencies before changing an early fact, or one repair becomes three holes.
- Give any planted fix a second job so it does not read as a patch.
- Fix holes the ending stands on first; log cosmetic ones for later or never.
Try it yourself
Take a finished draft and deliberately find its worst hole by writing the two-half formulation for every scene transition. Repair it twice: once with an explanation at the point of strain, once with a disguised upstream plant. Give both versions to a reader and ask where the story felt slowest.
Questions
Should I fix plot holes while drafting or after?
After, in nearly all cases. Mid-draft repairs stall momentum and often address contradictions the ending will dissolve anyway. Keep a running 'debts' list as you draft, then repair against the finished shape, when you finally know which facts are load-bearing.
What if I find a plot hole after publishing or submitting?
For a submission, note it and move on; you cannot recall the file, and judges weigh whole stories, not ledgers of trivia. For serial or self-published work you can repair in later instalments, but visible retconning has its own costs, so save it for holes that damage meaning.
Can beta readers find plot holes better than I can?
Usually, because they lack your knowledge of intentions; they read only what the page establishes. Brief them to mark every hesitation, not just nameable errors, and ask afterwards how each character knew each key fact. That question surfaces the information holes readers feel but rarely articulate.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the August contest and have your own poem read and scored.