What Is an Open Ending?
Quick answer: An open ending leaves a story's outcome deliberately unresolved, inviting the reader to complete it. What makes one work, with examples and pitfalls.
An open ending is a deliberate choice to end a story without fully resolving its outcome, leaving the reader to complete the final movement themselves. The lovers stand at the crossroads and the story stops; the letter is delivered but never read on the page. Intention is the heart of the definition: an open ending is designed, with the possibilities narrowed to a meaningful few, whereas an unresolved mess is simply a story that stopped before finishing its work.
Writers reach for open endings because life rarely supplies clean resolutions and because a reader who completes a story participates in it, which deepens the memory of it. But the form is harder than it looks. Openness succeeds only when everything except the withheld outcome is fully resolved, so the reader is left holding a genuine question rather than a shrug.
The longer answer: open at one point, closed everywhere else
The paradox of the successful open ending is how much closure it requires. The character arcs complete, the theme becomes legible, the emotional account settles; only the plot's final outcome stays suspended, and usually between exactly two readings rather than among infinite ones. Frank Stockton's 'The Lady, or the Tiger?' (1882) is the laboratory case: every fact is resolved except which door opens, and the story explicitly hands the decision to the reader's own beliefs about love and jealousy. The openness is the point, not an evasion of one.
A second species withholds not an event but a verdict. Henry James's The Turn of the Screw (1898) lets every scene support two incompatible readings, ghosts or madness, and the openness generates a century of argument. A third species, common in literary short fiction, resolves the inner story while leaving the outer situation suspended: Chekhov's lovers in 'The Lady with the Dog' end mid-difficulty, but what they now understand about themselves is complete.
In every species, the withheld element must be load-bearing and the withholding must feel like the story's final statement: this is the kind of question no honest teller would answer for you.
What separates open from unfinished
Three tests. First, the narrowing test: a true open ending leaves two or three charged possibilities, not fog. The reader should be able to argue a case for each door. Second, the completeness test: cover the last page and ask what remains unresolved besides the withheld outcome; the answer should be nothing important. Third, the meaning test: the openness itself must say something, that the choice is unknowable, that both outcomes are true to the character, that the reader's answer reveals the reader.
Notice how often celebrated open endings pass all three. The unresolved final image of many modern stories, a phone beginning to ring, a car idling at a junction, works because the story has made both answers fully imaginable and equally costly. When student drafts fail with the same gesture, it is almost always because the possibilities were never built: the ringing phone could be anyone, so it is no one.
How to write one
Decide first what single element you are withholding, an event, a verdict, or a future, and resolve everything else with unusual thoroughness. Then build both (or all three) of your live possibilities on the page: give each a scene's worth of plausibility, so the final suspension is between developed alternatives. Aim the last paragraph at the question, not away from it; the strongest open endings end looking directly at the door.
Signal intention through form. A final image of balanced weight, a sentence that could complete either way, a repeated motif now ambiguous: these tell the reader the openness is chosen. If you write for competitions, be aware that blind judges distinguish sharply between the two kinds of open: an ending that suspends a fully built question reads as command of structure, while an ending that simply stops reads as a missed deadline, and the score follows accordingly.
Common mistakes
The cardinal one is fog: leaving many things vaguely unresolved rather than one thing sharply unresolved. Openness is a spotlight, not a power cut. Related is the unearned ambiguity of withholding information the narrator plainly possesses, which reads as coyness rather than depth.
Second, the shrug ending, where the writer, unable to choose an outcome, exports the indecision and calls it artistic. Readers can smell the difference between a question the story cannot answer and one the writer would not. Third, opening the wrong element: suspending a subplot while resolving the main question backwards produces confusion, not resonance. And finally, overuse. One open ending in a collection haunts; five in a row read as a tic, and each successive one costs the writer credibility that the openness is a decision.
What poets can take from this
- Withhold exactly one load-bearing element; resolve everything else completely.
- Narrow the openness to two or three arguable possibilities, and build each on the page.
- End looking at the question, not drifting away from it.
- Never withhold what your narrator plainly knows.
- Ask whether you are posing a question or dodging a decision; readers can tell.
Try it yourself
Write a story that ends with a character holding an envelope they have every reason both to open and to burn. Build the case for each action in separate scenes, then end the story in the second before the decision, with both outcomes fully imaginable.
Questions
Do readers actually like open endings?
Many do, when the openness is earned: surveys of book clubs and the endurance of famously open stories suggest readers enjoy completing a well-built question. What readers dislike is unresolved work sold as ambiguity, and they are rarely fooled about which they received.
Is an open ending the same as a cliffhanger?
No. A cliffhanger suspends the outcome to compel continuation, and promises an answer in the next instalment. An open ending suspends the outcome as the story's final statement; no answer is coming, and that permanence is the effect.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the August contest and have your own poem read and scored.