The Babus of Nayanjore by Rabindranath Tagore
Quick answer: The Babus of Nayanjore by Rabindranath Tagore: summary with the ending, Kailas Babu and Kusum explained, themes of pride and kindness, and the craft.
The great house of Nayanjore is long ruined, but old Kailas Babu still lives as if the family fortune were merely resting, and all Calcutta kindly plays along. All except one young man, who has decided that honesty requires him to puncture the old gentleman's harmless grandeur. Tagore published the story in English in The Hungry Stones and Other Stories in 1916, and it remains his funniest and most forgiving portrait of vanity, including the narrator's own.
The plot turns on a practical joke that goes exactly as planned and shames only its author. Students get asked about pride, old aristocracy and new money; writers get one of the best unreliable narrators in Indian fiction, a man who convicts himself in the act of telling his own story. Summary with the full ending is below.
The story in brief
Kailas Babu, last of the Babus of Nayanjore, has lost everything except his manners. He lives in a small Calcutta house with his orphaned granddaughter Kusum, keeps up every ceremony of departed wealth, and speaks of the family's vanished glory as if it were current news. The neighbourhood, out of affection, honours the performance. The narrator, a self-made rich man's son, proud of his education and prouder of his plain-spoken honesty, finds the old man's pretensions intolerable, and his irritation is sharpened by wounded vanity: word has reached him that Kailas Babu did not consider him grand enough for a match with Kusum.
So he stages his masterpiece. Knowing that the old man's deepest pride is the notion that the great world still remembers Nayanjore, the narrator arranges a fake visit: he arrives at Kailas Babu's door in borrowed splendour, passing himself off as a great official come to pay respects to the illustrious house. The old man, overwhelmed with joy, spends what little he has and every ounce of his dignity honouring the guest, offering up his shabby best as if it were a palace's plenty. The prank succeeds completely, and then turns in the narrator's hand: he learns that Kusum saw through the disguise from the first moment and said nothing, letting her grandfather have his happiness. Her silent knowledge scalds him worse than any accusation. Ashamed, he confesses everything, is forgiven with a generosity he knows he has not earned, and in the end marries Kusum. The story closes with the narrator transformed into the loudest defender of the glories of Nayanjore, and Kailas Babu's grandeur intact.
The three people who matter
The story needs only three characters, arranged so that each one sees more than the one who mocks them.
Themes: honesty as a form of vanity
On the surface this is old aristocracy against new money: a family with a glorious name and nothing else, faced by a family with everything else and no name. Exam answers should note how the whole neighbourhood conspires in Kailas Babu's fiction, which turns his delusion into a kind of communal kindness, a gift everyone gives a harmless old man. The prank, by contrast, is truth deployed as a weapon, and the story is unambiguous about which it finds more decent.
The sharper point is in the narrator's favourite virtue. His honesty, examined closely, is vanity wearing a virtue's coat: he wants credit for plain speaking, and the fake visit is less about correcting a delusion than about punishing a slight. Tagore's neatest stroke is Kusum, who possesses the fullest knowledge of the truth and chooses silence, proving that what the narrator calls honesty was never about truth at all. The most truthful character in the story is the one who never says what she knows.
The craft: a narrator who convicts himself
The story is a first-person confession, and Tagore tunes the voice so that its self-praise arrives slightly too loud from the opening paragraphs. We are told of the narrator's honesty by the narrator, which is exactly how we learn to doubt it. This is the great trick of confessional narration: the teller's blind spots are visible to the reader pages before they become visible to him, so his humiliation feels both inevitable and earned. When Kusum's silent knowledge is revealed, no narrator commentary is needed; the structure has done the moral arithmetic already.
The reveal itself is worth studying: the prank's success and the prank's failure are the same event, seen twice. Nothing goes wrong with the plan; what collapses is its meaning. Writers hunting for twist endings usually reach for new information, but the stronger twist is often old information reframed, and a first-person voice this well controlled would sweep the Storytelling and Structure marks in Writory's Short Story Contest when it opens this September.
What poets can take from this
- In exams, define the narrator as unreliable and quote his self-praise as your evidence; the story is built on that gap.
- Use Kusum's silence as the moral centre: she knows the most and says the least.
- Frame the neighbourhood's play-acting as communal kindness, the exact opposite of the narrator's weaponised truth.
- Note that the ending reforms the mocker, not the mocked: Kailas Babu never needs to change.
- As a writer, let a first-person narrator praise himself a shade too much in the first page, then make him earn the reader's forgiveness.
Try it yourself
Write a first-person story in which the narrator plays a joke that works perfectly. Let the shame arrive not from the joke failing, but from the narrator discovering that someone quietly watched him do it and understood exactly why.
Questions
What happens at the end of The Babus of Nayanjore?
The narrator discovers that Kusum recognised him through his disguise from the start and stayed silent to protect her grandfather's joy. Overcome with shame, he confesses the prank, is forgiven, and marries Kusum. He ends the story as the most devoted upholder of Kailas Babu's tales of Nayanjore's glory.
Why does the narrator play the trick on Kailas Babu?
He tells himself it is honesty, a blow against ridiculous pretension. In truth his pride is stung: he resents the suggestion that his new-money family is not grand enough for Kusum, and the prank is revenge dressed as principle. The story's comedy comes from him slowly admitting this.
What is the theme of The Babus of Nayanjore?
It contrasts harmless vanity with the crueller vanity of self-declared honesty. Kailas Babu's delusions hurt no one and are sustained by neighbourly kindness, while the narrator's truth-telling is really wounded pride. Generosity, the story argues, is a deeper virtue than accuracy.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the August contest and have your own poem read and scored.