The Interlopers by Saki
Quick answer: The Interlopers by Saki: complete summary with the famous one-word ending, the feud of Ulrich and Georg, themes of reconciliation and nature's indifference.
Two men hunt each other through a Carpathian forest on a winter night, each hoping to end a feud their grandfathers began over a worthless strip of woodland, and the forest settles the question its own way. The Interlopers appeared in The Toys of Peace in 1919, published after Saki's death in the First World War, and its last word is one of the most famous single words in short fiction.
American high schools have made it a standard text for irony; its history, a story about men reconciling too late, written by an author soon to die in the trenches, gives it a shadow none of Saki's drawing-room comedies carry. It is his grimmest tale and arguably his most perfectly aimed.
The story in brief, ending included
Ulrich von Gradwitz patrols a narrow strip of steep forest on a stormy winter night, armed, hoping to meet not game but a man: Georg Znaeym, whose family has disputed this ground with his for three generations, ever since a lawsuit awarded it to the Gradwitz line. The two have hated each other personally since boyhood. Rounding a great beech, they come face to face, rifles in hand. Each hesitates a civilised man's instant before the murder his heart has already agreed to, and in that instant the storm decides: a mass of the beech crashes down and pins them both, injured, inches apart, each unable to move.
They begin as they mean to continue, trading threats about whose men will arrive first and whose body will be found under the tree. But cold, pain and wine do their work: Ulrich manages to reach his flask and, after drinking, offers it to his enemy. Slowly, and with the strange lightheadedness of men who expect to die, the feud collapses. Ulrich proposes friendship; Georg, after a long silence, accepts, and both are half drunk on the picture of the peace to come, each feasting the other publicly, astonishing the countryside. They agree to shout together for rescue, and after a while Ulrich makes out figures coming down the hillside toward them. He cries out joyfully; they cannot yet tell whose men they are. Georg asks. Ulrich strains his eyes at the shapes hurrying toward them and answers with the story's final line, a laugh gone to fear, one word: wolves. That is the ending. Saki closes the story there, on the word itself, with the men's fate left one second beyond the last full stop.
The characters
Two names, one inherited hatred, and a third party neither man counted.
Themes: feud, reconciliation and the third interloper
The taught themes are real and worth stating cleanly: the inherited feud as self-perpetuating machine, the reconciliation that proves enmity was always a choice, and nature's total indifference to human quarrels. The title carries the ironic key. Each man considers the other the interloper on the land; the tree and the wolves reveal that, from the forest's perspective, both men are the interlopers, and their ownership dispute is a rumour the wilderness never heard.
The sharper reading concerns timing. Saki does not punish the feud; he punishes its schedule. The men are given every opportunity to reconcile across three generations of safety and choose to do it only when pinned under a tree, and the story's cruelty is that repentance at the last minute is accepted by heaven and ignored by wolves. Written by a man who volunteered for a war fed by exactly such ancestral quarrels, the story reads less like irony for its own sake than like a report from the era's conscience. That resonance is fair game in an essay, provided you anchor it in the text's own machinery.
The craft: compression, pivot and the one-word ending
Notice the story's proportions. History, geography and hatred are compressed into a page of preamble; the tree falls almost as soon as the men meet, because Saki knows his story is not the ambush but the conversation under the trunk. The pivot, threats turning to shared wine turning to friendship, is given room to breathe and made credible by pain, cold and the psychology of men expecting death. Slow the middle, spring the ends: it is a rhythm any writer can bank, and one that contest judges scoring structure recognise on the first read.
The ending is the textbook case of the withheld final beat. Saki ends on the recognition, not the consequence: no screaming, no rescue attempt, no aftermath, one word and white space. The reader's imagination, better equipped than any sentence, writes the rest. Note also the fair play: wind-stressed trees, a hard winter, and the wildness of the region are established early, so the beech and the wolves arrive as members of the story's world rather than authorial ambushes. If your twist needs new information in its final line, it is not yet a twist; it is an interruption.
Saki, the war and this story's afterlife
Hector Hugh Munro was killed at Beaumont-Hamel in November 1916; The Toys of Peace gathered work he left behind. Readers ever since have found it difficult, and unnecessary, to separate The Interlopers from that fact. The story's argument, that men discover their brotherhood one gesture too late for it to save them, was about to be enacted on a continental scale by the civilisation that produced it. None of that biographical shadow is required to feel the ending; but it explains why this particular tale, unlike Saki's satires of tea tables and country houses, is played without a smile from the first line.
What poets can take from this
- For exams, define the title's irony: each man calls the other the interloper, while nature treats both as intruders.
- Cite the flask of wine as the reconciliation's turning point and a rare Saki moment of unironic warmth.
- Name the ending's device, a final line withheld to a single word, and note the aftermath is left entirely offstage.
- Writers: establish your twist's agents early; the storm-stressed forest makes both the falling beech and the wolves fair.
- Discuss timing as theme: the story punishes late reconciliation, not reconciliation itself.
- Compare with O. Henry twists in essays; Saki's version replaces coincidence with nature's indifference.
Try it yourself
Write a story in which two people bound by an inherited grievance are trapped together by an impersonal force, weather, machinery, geography, and reconcile sincerely. Then let the same impersonal world deliver the final line, one sentence at most, and end before the consequence arrives.
Questions
What happens at the end of The Interlopers?
Just after Ulrich and Georg end their feud and shout together for rescue, figures come down the hillside. Asked whose men they are, Ulrich sees they are not men at all and answers with the story's final word: wolves. Their deaths are implied, not shown.
What is the irony in The Interlopers?
Both situational and dramatic. The men reconcile only when trapped, and their joint cries for help summon wolves instead of rescuers. The title's irony is that nature regards both feuding owners as the true interlopers on the land.
What is the theme of The Interlopers?
The futility of inherited hatred and the indifference of nature to human claims. The feud over a worthless strip of forest costs both men everything, and their late reconciliation changes their hearts but not their fate.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the August contest and have your own poem read and scored.