Overwriting
Quick answer: Overwriting is doing too much on the line: stacked adjectives, straining metaphors, purple prose. Learn to diagnose it, cut it, and keep the voice that matters.
It was a dark and stormy night; the rain fell in torrents, except at occasional intervals, when it was checked by a violent gust of wind. That opening, from Edward Bulwer-Lytton's Paul Clifford (1830), has become the emblem of overwriting: prose doing too much, too loudly, for too little return. Overwriting is the habit of stacking adjectives, straining metaphors, repeating in triplicate and decorating every noun until the sentence buckles. In other words, it is effort showing.
Every writer overwrites in draft, and the term really names a revision failure: material that should have been thinned and was not. It afflicts beginners who equate intensity with quality, and experienced writers on the days they fall in love with their own voice. The cure is the same for both.
The term at work: what Bulwer-Lytton's sentence is doing wrong
Look closely at the famous opening. Dark and stormy tells us twice what one exact detail would show once. The torrents are interrupted mid-sentence by a weather report qualification, except at occasional intervals, that no reader needed. The sentence goes on past the quoted portion to rattle rooftops and agitate lamp flames, still describing weather while the story waits. Nothing here is ungrammatical or even individually terrible; the fault is accumulation without selection. Every clause competes, so none wins.
Compare any strong storm opening written since, and the difference is subtraction: one dominant image, chosen because it means something to the character about to get wet. Overwriting is rarely a vocabulary problem. It is a nerve problem, the writer not trusting one good detail to carry the load, so sending four mediocre ones along as escort.
The forms it takes
Purple prose is the flowery strain: perfumed vocabulary, cascading clauses, emotion inflated past what the scene has earned. But overwriting has plainer disguises. There is redundancy, nodded his head, shrugged his shoulders, whispered quietly. There is the adjective stack, the cold, grey, forbidding, ancient stone wall. There is metaphor pile-up, where a heart is a drum, then a caged bird, then a fist, within one paragraph. There is explaining after showing: she slammed the cup down, furious. The slam said it; furious unsays it.
All the forms share one signature: the ratio of words to meaning has tipped. The prose is working hard and the story is standing still. Readers register it as a vague exhaustion long before they could name the cause, and judges register it fast; on a rubric line for language and craft, control outranks lushness every time.
How to cut without going bloodless
Revise with a one-per-customer rule: one adjective per noun at most, one metaphor per paragraph, one way of conveying each emotion. Where two details compete, keep the stranger one. Read aloud and mark every phrase you are proud of, then interrogate exactly those, since darlings cluster where overwriting does. Kill the explanations that follow your showings; if the gesture works, the label is redundant, and if it does not, fix the gesture.
The trap on the far side is overcorrection into beige minimalism, prose so defensively plain it has no pulse. The goal is not less style; it is style with nothing wasted. Lyrical prose, covered in its own entry, shows how much music a sentence can carry when every note is load-bearing. Cut until what remains is deliberate, then stop cutting.
Neighbours and opposites
Purple prose is the subspecies of overwriting concerned with ornament; melodrama is its emotional cousin, feeling inflated past the story's evidence, and can occur in plain prose. Filter words are a different, quieter form of excess, extra perceptual scaffolding rather than decoration, which is why the two edits pair well in revision. Lyrical prose is the neighbour most slandered by association: musical, image-rich writing is not overwriting when the music carries meaning.
The opposite is economy, sometimes called tight prose, where every word earns its place. Note that economy is not brevity; a long Woolf sentence can be perfectly economical, and a six-word sentence can waste three. The distinction matters in revision, because writers told to tighten often respond by shortening, hacking clauses off sentences that were pulling their weight while leaving the true redundancies untouched. Tightening means auditing each word for function, whatever the sentence length, and the audit usually finds the fat in the proud passages, not the long ones.
What poets can take from this
- Allow one adjective per noun and one metaphor per paragraph, then negotiate exceptions.
- Cut every emotion label that follows a gesture already showing it.
- Search for adverbs attached to strong verbs; most are freeloaders.
- Mark the phrases you are proudest of and interrogate those first.
- Read aloud: overwriting announces itself to the ear before the eye.
- Trim to deliberate, not to bare; economy is not the same as brevity.
Try it yourself
Take a page of your most decorated draft and cut it to exactly half its word count without losing any event, feeling or image you consider essential. List what survived. Then rewrite the page fresh from that list alone and compare it with the original.
Questions
Is purple prose the same as overwriting?
Purple prose is one variety of it: the ornate, perfumed strain. Overwriting is the broader habit of excess, which also includes redundancy, adjective stacking and explaining what has been shown, all of which can occur in plain vocabulary.
How do I know if a passage is overwritten or just stylistically rich?
Cut the most decorated element and reread. If meaning or feeling drains away, the element was structural and the style is earning its keep. If the passage sharpens, you were overwriting. Rich style survives subtraction badly; overwriting improves under it.
Why do beginners overwrite?
Usually from distrust: of the detail, which gets three backups, and of the reader, who gets everything explained twice. Experience teaches that one exact detail, trusted, outperforms four approximate ones with an explanation attached.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the August contest and have your own poem read and scored.