What Is Experimental Fiction?
Quick answer: What experimental fiction means: stories that break form, structure or language on purpose, with famous examples and advice for experimenting well yourself.
Experimental fiction is fiction that deliberately breaks the accepted conventions of storytelling, in structure, language, typography, chronology or the basic contract with the reader, and makes the breakage part of the meaning. A novel told in second person, a story printed as an index, chapters you can read in any order, a page that goes black: if the form itself is doing expressive work that conventional form could not, the fiction is experimental.
The definition matters because 'experimental' gets used two ways: as a compliment for the daring and as a euphemism for the unreadable. The useful test is purpose. In good experimental work, the strange form is the only form the story could take. In weak experimental work, a conventional story wears an odd costume, and readers can feel the costume.
The longer answer: convention is the raw material
Every experiment defines itself against a norm, so experimental fiction is really a moving target. Tristram Shandy (1759) was wildly experimental, all digressions, a black page mourning a character, a squiggle drawn to describe a plot, and it did this before most conventions of the novel had even hardened. James Joyce's Ulysses (1922) rewrote what narration could be, a different technique for every episode, including a chapter of questions and answers. Virginia Woolf dissolved plot into consciousness. Each generation's experiment becomes the next generation's available technique: stream of consciousness was once an outrage and is now a workshop staple.
It helps to sort experiments by what they break. Structure: nonlinear timelines, reversed chronology, stories in footnotes. Language: invented dialects, unpunctuated flow, constraint writing such as Georges Perec's novel written entirely without the letter e. The physical book: B. S. Johnson's The Unfortunates, published as loose sections in a box to be shuffled. The reader contract: second-person narration, choose-your-path branching, narrators who address or accuse you. Knowing which wall you are drilling through keeps an experiment coherent.
One honest caveat: experimental is a spectrum, not a club. Most published fiction that reads as fresh contains one controlled experiment inside an otherwise stable frame, and that single-variable approach is usually where working writers should start.
Experiments that earned their keep
Julio Cortazar's Hopscotch (1963) offers two reading orders and makes indecision itself the theme of an indecisive hero. Mark Z. Danielewski's House of Leaves sets an academic commentary, a family's home video and footnote spirals in typographic mazes, so that reading the book physically mimics being lost in the house. Jennifer Egan ended A Visit from the Goon Squad with a chapter built as slide-show diagrams, and it works because the chapter belongs to a child who thinks in diagrams; the form is characterisation.
Smaller-scale examples are just as instructive. Lorrie Moore's Self-Help tells stories in second-person imperative, mock instructions for surviving heartbreak. Amy Hempel and Lydia Davis compress stories to a paragraph, sometimes a sentence. George Saunders builds stories from corporate memos and customer feedback forms. Notice the constant: in every case you can state, in one sentence, why the form fits the feeling. Slide diagrams for a silence-filled family. A maze for a haunted house. Instructions for a life out of control. That one sentence is the licence every experiment must be able to show.
How to experiment without losing the reader
Change one variable at a time. Take a story you could tell conventionally and alter a single element: tell it backwards, tell it in second person, tell it as a series of voicemails, delete all dialogue. Keeping every other element stable lets you, and the reader, measure what the change achieves. If the story gains nothing, you have learned something cheap; if it gains, you have a real piece.
Anchor the reader early. Experimental fiction survives on trust, so establish quickly that a controlling intelligence is at work: consistent rules, a clear voice, an early payoff that proves the strangeness rewards attention. Readers will climb any wall once they believe there is a garden behind it. Keep the emotional through-line simple when the form is complex; House of Leaves is typographically wild but emotionally plain, a man scared for his family. Complexity in both channels at once is where readers drown.
Finally, test it cold. Give the piece to someone who has heard nothing about your intentions and ask them to say what happened and what they felt. Blind evaluation is the honest mirror; it is the same reason contest rubrics that score structure and language separately, as Writory's story contest does, are useful feedback for formal risk-takers.
Common mistakes and misconceptions
The primary mistake is decoration: bolting a gimmick onto a story that would work identically without it. If your story in tweets would be the same story in paragraphs, the form is a costume. The second mistake is difficulty worship, believing that obscurity equals depth. Joyce is difficult because consciousness is difficult, not to keep readers out; when difficulty has no expressive job, it is just a locked door with nothing behind it.
A third error is skipping the fundamentals. The writers who break structure brilliantly, Egan, Saunders, Davis, can all write a devastating conventional scene, and their experiments stand on that competence. Learn to build tension, character and consequence first, because an experiment is a bet placed with craft as the stake. And one misconception to retire: experimental does not mean plotless. Hopscotch has a love story. House of Leaves has a monster. Form is the adventure; story is still the reason anyone comes along.
What poets can take from this
- State in one sentence why this story needs this form; no sentence, no experiment.
- Change one convention at a time and keep everything else rock solid.
- Teach the reader your rules in the first page, then keep them consistently.
- Pair complex form with a simple, strong emotional line.
- Prove the experiment by testing on a cold reader who knows nothing of your intent.
- Master the conventional scene first; experiments are funded by craft.
Try it yourself
Tell the story of a friendship's slow end entirely through one shared document: a holiday packing list edited by both friends across five years. Use additions, deletions and comments only.
Questions
Is experimental fiction the same as literary fiction?
No. Literary fiction describes ambition and depth of character and theme, and most of it is formally conventional. Experimental fiction specifically disrupts form. The categories overlap often, but a quiet realist masterpiece is literary without being experimental.
What is metafiction?
Metafiction is fiction aware of itself as fiction: narrators who discuss writing the story, characters who know they are characters. It is one branch of experimental writing, running from Tristram Shandy through Italo Calvino's If on a winter's night a traveller.
Can experimental stories win contests?
Yes, when the experiment serves the story and the piece still delivers character, feeling and momentum. Judges reward controlled risk; they penalise confusion. Clarity of event, however strange the telling, is usually the deciding factor.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the August contest and have your own poem read and scored.