Overrated Famous Poems: You're Allowed to Say It
A contest judge argues that disliking famous poems is how taste actually forms, names three overrated classics with exact reasons, and shares a four-step test for earning your dislikes.
At a dinner two summers ago, a schoolteacher leaned across the table and confessed, in the tone people use for actual crimes, that she had never liked "The Road Not Taken." She had taught it for eleven years. She waited for me, the contest judge at the table, to gasp. Instead I told her my own secret: I think Joyce Kilmer's "Trees" is one of the most overrated famous poems in the English language, and I have thought so since I was fourteen. Her whole posture changed. What followed was the best conversation about poetry I had that year, and it happened precisely because we both stopped pretending.
So let me put the permission in writing. You are allowed to dislike famous poems. Not just allowed: if you never dislike anything canonical, your taste is not humble, it is unformed.
Where the Canon Actually Comes From
Readers imagine the canon as a verdict handed down by quality itself. It is closer to a series of accidents with good publicity. A poem becomes famous because it fit an anthology's page count, because it was easy to teach to fifteen-year-olds, because a composer set it to music, because it suited a war, a funeral fashion, a national mood. Merit is one ingredient among many, and rarely the deciding one.
"Trees" is a perfect case. It survives because it rhymes cleanly, fits on a greeting card, and flatters a pleasant sentiment. Meanwhile poems of enormous strangeness and power from the same decade sit unread because no one could teach them in forty minutes. None of this means the canon is worthless; it means the canon is a record of what got repeated, not a ranking of what deserved to be. Those are different lists, with real overlap and real gaps.
Once you see the machinery, reverence relaxes into something healthier: attention. You stop asking "why don't I feel what I am supposed to feel?" and start asking "what is this poem actually doing, and do I rate it?" The second question is the only one that ever taught anyone anything.
Taste is not the list of things you love. It is the accuracy of your reasons.
Dislike Is Not Dismissal, and the Difference Is Everything
Here is the line I hold, and I hold it hard. You may dislike any poem ever written. You may not dismiss a poem you have not actually read, aloud, at least twice. Dislike is a considered response. Dismissal is a mood wearing a considered response's clothes.
The teacher at that dinner had earned her dislike: eleven years, hundreds of readings, a specific and defensible complaint about how the poem's last stanza gets sentimentalized by readers who skip the middle. That is dislike of the highest quality. Compare the person who waves off all of Frost as "greeting card stuff" having read four of his poems in high school. One of these people has taste. The other has an attitude. If you want to test which you have about Frost, sit with "The Road Not Taken" again and notice that it is a far stranger, more ironic poem than its reputation, which is a different discovery: sometimes the famous poem is fine and the fame is what's wrong.
Three Overrated Famous Poems, and What Each Teaches Anyway
Since taste needs specifics, here are mine. Argue with them; that is the point.
- "Trees" by Joyce Kilmer. "I think that I shall never see / A poem lovely as a tree." The poem then personifies the tree into incoherence: its mouth is at the earth, its arms in the sky, its hair full of robins, a body no reader can assemble. What it teaches: mixed metaphor is not fixed by sincerity. Kilmer meant every word, and the anatomy still does not scan.
- "A Psalm of Life" by Longfellow. Thumping, quotable, and allergic to the specific. "Life is real! Life is earnest!" is a slogan, not an image. What it teaches: exclamation is the sound a poem makes when it cannot show you anything. Longfellow wrote much better than this, which is exactly why its fame annoys me.
- "Invictus" by W. E. Henley. This is the pick that causes fights. The circumstances are genuinely moving, the closing couplet is immortal, and the machinery between is abstraction stacked on abstraction: fell clutch, bludgeonings, menace of the years. What it teaches: two great lines can carry fourteen, and a poet should know which two are doing the carrying.
Notice the pattern: each dislike, stated precisely, converts into a craft lesson. That conversion is the whole reason disliking famous poems is worth doing carefully.
The Honest Dislike Test: Four Steps Before You Say It Out Loud
Use this whenever a celebrated poem leaves you cold and you want to know whether your reaction is taste or weather.
- Read it aloud twice, once fast, once slow. A poem you have only seen has not yet happened to you. Sound rescues more reputations than any critic does.
- Name the exact line where it loses you. Not "the whole vibe." A line number. If you cannot point to one, you have a mood, not an objection, and moods pass.
- Find one thing it does genuinely well. Every canonical poem does at least one thing well; that is usually how it got in the door. Naming the strength makes your criticism trustworthy, to others and to yourself.
- Rewrite your objection as a craft note. "I hate this" becomes "the abstractions outnumber the images four to one." Now your dislike is portable: you can carry it into your own drafts and use it there, which is where questions like what actually makes a poem good stop being theoretical.
A Worked Example: Fixing the Kilmer Problem
Complaints should be demonstrated, so here is a couplet I wrote in the "Trees" manner, committing its exact sin:
O gentle rain that feeds the flower, / thou art sweet mercy's silver shower.
Inverted syntax, secondhand diction, an abstraction ("mercy") doing the work an image should do. Now the same impulse, rebuilt to face the actual world:
Rain finds the one crack in the gutter / and feeds the weed the wall keeps secret.
Same subject, same reverence for small persistence, but now there is a particular gutter, a particular weed, and a verb ("keeps secret") with some tension in it. This is what your precise dislikes buy you: the first couplet annoyed me for twenty years, and that annoyance, once named, became an editing instinct I use on my own lines weekly.
The Workshop Kid Who Hated Wordsworth
A few winters back I sat in on a school workshop where a sixteen-year-old announced, arms crossed, that "Daffodils" was boring and he did not care who knew it. The room tensed. The teacher, wisely, did not defend the poem. She asked him where it got boring. He flipped the page and said, instantly, "wealth. The line about wealth. Flowers were fine, then it turned into accounting." The kid had, without training, executed step two of the honest dislike test, and his complaint about "what wealth the show to me had brought" is a real critical position with a long history behind it.
Six months later, one of his poems crossed my desk in our monthly contest, and it was the most image-dense entry in his age group, not an abstraction in sight. I do not think that is coincidence. Precise dislike had trained his eye faster than admiration ever trains anyone. His score sheet, the same five-part breakdown every Writory entrant receives on the 30th, came back highest on language, and if you are curious where your own eye currently stands, the fastest way to find out is to put a poem in front of a judge and read the breakdown honestly.
Taste Is Built by Friction, Not Agreement
A reader who loves everything the canon tells them to love is like a hiker who only walks downhill. Comfortable, scenic, and getting weaker every year. The readers and writers I trust most all carry a short list of famous poems they respect and cannot love, and their reasons are so specific you could sharpen a pencil on them.
So build your list. Read the sacred cows aloud, twice, and let some of them fail you. Name the line, name the strength, convert the complaint into craft. Defend "Invictus" against me if you like; I will enjoy losing if your reasons are exact. The canon does not need your obedience. It survives on argument, and it has been waiting, politely, for yours.
By Team Writory, for Writory.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.