Stop Waiting for Inspiration: A Contest Judge's Case
A poetry judge explains why waiting for inspiration loses more good poems than weak craft ever does, and offers a five-step cold-start routine for writing well on days the feeling never arrives.
Every month I watch the same small tragedy in our submission queue. A poet enters once, in a month when something obviously struck them, a death, a birth, a lit window on a night walk, and the poem crackles. Then they vanish. Eight months later they return with another lightning-strike poem, having written almost nothing in between, because they were waiting for inspiration to come back. Meanwhile a less dazzling poet has entered every single month, and somewhere around entry six, quietly, permanently, becomes the better writer. Waiting for inspiration feels like devotion. From where I sit, it looks like the single most expensive habit in poetry.
Waiting for Inspiration Is a Scheduling Problem
Strip the romance off and look at what the waiting poet is actually doing: outsourcing their writing schedule to a feeling that keeps no calendar, answers no messages, and shows up mostly when it is inconvenient. No one runs any other practice this way. A violinist who only played when moved would never get through scales. A runner who waited for the urge would train four times a year.
Yet poets defend the wait fiercely, and I understand why. The poems that arrive on a wave of feeling are genuinely pleasurable to write. They feel dictated. The mistake is concluding that because inspired drafting feels different, it produces different poems. On the scoresheet, it does not. I have run this experiment on myself more than once, sorting a year of my own drafts into inspired and uninspired piles before rereading them cold. The piles refused to sort by quality. Some of my most lifeless work arrived in ecstasy; two of the best poems I have ever finished began as chores. I cannot tell, reading blind, which poems arrived in a rush at 3 a.m. and which were assembled grimly on a Tuesday lunch break. Neither can you. Readers grade the poem, never the weather it was written in.
Inspiration Is an Unreliable Narrator
Here is the deeper problem: inspiration lies about its own role. Memory edits the story of every good poem in the feeling's favor. You remember the flash, the phrase that arrived whole in the shower. You forget the three notebook fragments from previous months that made the flash possible, the four revision passes that saved it, the ending you replaced twice. The finished poem gets narrated as a visitation, and the visitation gets the credit.
Inspiration is a guest who takes credit for the meal you cooked.
Emily Dickinson is instructive here. She left nearly eighteen hundred poems, produced inside a household routine of baking, gardening, and letters, at a pace that some years approached a poem a day. That is not a woman being periodically struck. That is a woman at her desk. When she writes "Tell all the truth but tell it slant, / Success in Circuit lies," the slyness of that couplet is the product of relentless daily work on compression, not a bolt from the Amherst sky. The bolts were real, I am sure. The desk is what caught them.
Notice what this does to the waiting strategy. If inspiration takes credit for work it did not do, then waiting for it means waiting for a witness who will lie to you about what happened. The poets who produce, decade after decade, have stopped interviewing the witness. They keep the desk hours and let the visitations sort themselves out.
The Poem I Did Not Feel Like Writing
Let me offer evidence from my own notebook, since I am asking you to distrust a beloved feeling. Two winters ago I made myself draft on a morning of absolutely no inspiration, off a flat prompt: an ordinary object in the kitchen. I felt nothing. I wrote, resentfully, about a wooden spoon. The first version was as dead as I expected:
The old spoon sits in the drawer,
worn smooth by years of use.
Fifteen minutes of mechanical pushing later, no lightning at any point, I had this:
The spoon my mother stirred with has gone soft
at the lip, like a word said too many times.
I use it anyway. Some prayers
only work in the original wood.
Is it a masterpiece? No. It is a publishable little poem that did not exist at breakfast, produced entirely by procedure: pick the object, find where time touched it, compare the wear to something human, let the ending swerve. The swerve is the same muscle a volta trains, and it works whether or not you feel transported. If a cold Tuesday can produce four keepable lines, the wait was never necessary. If you are short on flat prompts to push against, our ordinary objects prompt set exists for exactly these mornings.
The Cold-Start Routine
Waiting has to be replaced with something, or the blank page wins by default. This is the routine I give poets who tell me they can only write when moved, and I ask them to run it for ten sessions before reporting back. Nobody has yet come back to argue. It takes about twenty five minutes, and it is deliberately mechanical, because the whole point is that it must work on the mornings when nothing in you wants to.
- Read one poem aloud before writing a word. Two minutes. You are not looking for ideas; you are tuning the ear, the way singers warm up. Cold starts fail at the level of rhythm first.
- Set a timer for ten minutes and describe one object or scene with no feelings allowed. Pure observation. Feelings smuggle themselves in through detail anyway, and they arrive better dressed.
- Force one comparison. Take the strangest detail you noticed and make it resemble something from a different room of your life. This is where poems ignite on schedule.
- Write a deliberately bad ending, then argue with it. The fastest route to a true ending is drafting the false one and asking what it is hiding.
- Stop mid-thought and note tomorrow's first line. Ending with a thread hanging makes the next cold start warm.
Run this five days in a row and something disorienting happens: the sessions start to feel inspired. Which reveals the real mechanics. The feeling was never the cause of good writing. It is a byproduct of engaged attention, and attention can be scheduled.
What to Do With Inspiration When It Does Show Up
None of this means refusing the wave when it comes. It means demoting inspiration from employer to occasional supplier. Practically, three rules:
- Capture, do not obey. When a phrase arrives unbidden, write it down and return to what you were doing. Inspired fragments keep; interrupted routines often do not.
- Bank the surplus. On the rare day the poems pour, draft two or three openings instead of finishing one. Future cold mornings will thank you.
- Audit the inspired drafts hardest. Poems written in a rush carry a glow for their author that readers cannot see. The drafts I regret sending out fastest were always the ones that felt dictated.
That last point deserves a moment of honesty. A poem I scored last winter had clearly arrived in one ecstatic sitting: enormous feeling, gorgeous second stanza, and an ending the poet plainly could not evaluate because the memory of writing it still felt holy. It scored 64 when 80 was sitting right there, one ruthless revision away. Inspiration wrote the poem and then stood in front of it, blocking the poet's view.
The 25th of the Month
I will end with an unglamorous confession about what actually gets poems finished, because I see the pattern at scale. Our contest window closes on the 25th, and every month the final three days bring a flood of entries. Some of those poets, they have told me so, had been waiting all month for the right mood, and the deadline simply fired them out of the chair. The date did what the muse would not.
That is worth sitting with. A number on a calendar reliably produces the state that poets spend months waiting to receive. Deadlines, timers, routines, streaks: these are not the enemies of inspiration, they are its delivery infrastructure. If you need one external date to build your practice around, a monthly submission deadline is the cheapest and most forgiving one I know, and the score that comes back gives your next month's work a direction.
Write on the days the feeling comes. Write on the days it does not. In six months, reading blind, I promise you will not be able to tell which poems were which, and neither will anyone else. The only visible difference will be how many poems exist.
By Team Writory, for Writory.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.