New Tools for Poets: What to Outsource, What to Keep
A contest judge sorts the new generation of writing tools into two piles: the jobs poets can outsource with a clear conscience, and the jobs that must stay human or the poem dies.
Last October I scored a poem that did everything right and nothing true. The meter was clean, the metaphors matched, the ending clicked shut like a well-made box. It scored well on structure and language and it died on emotion, because there was no person in it. I have read thousands of contest entries, and the newest problem in poetry is not bad writing. It is competent writing with nobody home. So here is my honest sorting of the new tools for poets: which jobs you can hand to software with a clear conscience, and which jobs, if you outsource them, will quietly end your growth as a writer.
I am not going to pretend the technology does not exist, and I am not going to pretend it is harmless. Both positions are lazy. A hammer is a tool. A ghostwriter is not a tool. The whole question is which one you are holding.
The Difference Between a Tool and a Ghostwriter
A tool does work you could do yourself, faster, without changing the decisions you make. A ghostwriter makes the decisions for you. Spellcheck is a tool. A text generator that drafts your elegy is a ghostwriter, and a bad one, because it has never lost anyone.
The test I give poets in workshops is simple: after the software has done its job, do you know your own poem better or worse? A rhyme lookup teaches you thirty options you then judge with your own ear. That is knowing the poem better. A generated stanza you paste in and lightly edit teaches you nothing except how to accept someone else's choices. That is knowing the poem worse, and judges can feel it, even when we cannot prove it.
A tool can polish a line. Only a life can supply one.
Tools for Poets That Earn Their Keep
Plenty of software genuinely serves the work. These are the jobs I happily outsource, and I recommend poets do the same without guilt:
- Transcription and dictation. Talking a rough draft into your phone on a walk is one of the oldest drafting methods in new clothing. Milton dictated an entire epic. You can dictate a sonnet.
- Rhyme, syllable, and etymology lookups. Poets have used rhyming dictionaries for centuries. Digital ones are just faster. The choosing is still yours.
- Cliche detection. Ask software to flag every phrase in your draft that appears constantly in print. It is ruthless and unoffendable, which is exactly what you want at that stage. Whether to keep the flagged phrase remains your call.
- Submission tracking and formatting. Spreadsheets, reminders, standard manuscript formatting. Zero artistic content, real hours saved.
- Research. If your poem needs the correct name for the bones of a bird's wing, look it up quickly and get back to the actual writing.
- Read-aloud playback. Hearing a flat synthetic voice read your poem exposes rhythm problems your own performing voice hides. I use this on my own drafts and it is humbling every time.
Notice the pattern. Every job on that list is either mechanical or informational. None of them touches the two sacred operations of poetry: noticing and choosing.
What You Must Never Hand Over
Here is my hard line, and I will defend it. You must never outsource the noticing, and you must never outsource the choosing.
The noticing is the raw material: your grandmother's specific way of folding a dish towel, the exact color of a hospital corridor at 3 a.m., the wrong word your father used at the funeral that turned out to be the right word. No software has access to any of that. When a generator produces images for you, it produces the statistical average of everyone's images, which is why generated poems reach so often for light through windows, for oceans of feeling, for hearts that shatter. Averages are the opposite of poetry.
The choosing is revision: this word over that word, this line break instead of that one, cutting the stanza you love because the poem does not need it. Every one of those choices trains your taste, and taste is the only skill that compounds over a writing life. Outsource the choices and you stay exactly as good as you are today, forever.
A poem I scored last winter made this painfully clear. It was about a mother's dementia, and one line stopped me cold: she saluted the microwave like an old colleague. No machine wrote that. That line was witnessed. It carried the whole poem to the top of my stack, past entries with far smoother technique, because the theme of grief only lands when the details could belong to one household on earth.
A Line Edit No Machine Would Make
Let me show you the difference in practice. Here is a line of the kind generators and tired poets both produce:
Her absence filled the empty house with silence.
Grammatically fine. Emotionally nothing. Absence, empty, silence: three abstractions holding hands. Now watch what happens when a human who actually lived in that house revises it:
Her chair still faces the window she argued with.
The revision is not smoother. It is stranger, and strangeness is the fingerprint of a real perceiver. The chair does the mourning. The window gets a history. A reader stops and rereads, and rereading is the whole game. Software can suggest a thousand alternatives to the first line, but it cannot know that your mother argued with the window about the neighbor's hedge for eleven years. That knowledge is your entire competitive advantage. Guard it.
The Five Question Filter
When you are unsure whether to hand a job to software, run it through these five questions, in order. I built this filter for my own students and it has held up.
- Could I do this myself with enough time? If no, it is research or logistics: outsource freely. If yes, keep asking.
- Does doing it myself train my ear or my eye? If yes, do it yourself at least until the skill is solid. Counting syllables by hand for a year will teach you meter in your body. After that, use the counter.
- Will the output contain decisions? Word choices, images, line breaks, endings are decisions. Anything that hands you decisions instead of options is a ghostwriter. Decline.
- Would I be comfortable telling a judge exactly what the software did? If the honest sentence is "it drafted the third stanza," you already know the answer.
- Does it move me toward the desk or away from it? Tools that clear the path to writing are friends. Tools that replace the writing are termites.
Print that list, or better, argue with it. Poets who disagree with me thoughtfully are doing the choosing, which means they are doing the work.
Why Judges Can Tell, Even When We Can't Prove It
People ask me whether contest judges can really detect generated or heavily outsourced poems. The honest answer: not with certainty, and it does not matter, because the qualities that expose them are the same qualities that lose contests anyway. Uniform sentence lengths. Images that are pretty but interchangeable. Endings that resolve instead of resonate. Perfect competence, zero risk.
At Writory we score every entry across five criteria, and the pattern repeats monthly: outsourced-feeling poems score fine on structure and collapse on creativity and emotion, because those two criteria measure exactly what cannot be delegated. If you want to see where your own drafts land, the score breakdown every entrant receives is a more useful mirror than any software, precisely because human readers are behind it.
Strong opinion, stated plainly: a flawed poem with one witnessed image beats a flawless poem with none, every single month, on every judging panel I have sat on.
Keep the Wound, Outsource the Paperwork
The poets I worry about are not the ones using dictation apps or rhyme lookups. They are the ones quietly letting a generator make their choices because a blank page is frightening and the machine is not. I understand the temptation. The blank page frightens me too, after all these years. But the fear is load-bearing. The fear is the sign that something real is at stake, and readers pay us precisely for putting something real at stake.
So outsource the paperwork, the lookups, the tracking, the transcription. Automate everything that stands between you and the desk. Then sit at the desk alone, with your specific dead, your specific joys, your specific saluted microwave, and make every choice yourself. Do that for a year and your poems will carry a signature no software can imitate, because there is only one of you and there are a billion of it. More practical craft help lives in our writing tips, but the short version fits on an index card: keep the wound, keep the choosing, and let the machines carry everything else.
By Team Writory, for Writory.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.