Miracles
Loaves, cures and ordinary mornings: write the impossible so plainly it must be believed.
Quick answer: Learn to write poems about miracles: wonder imagery, craft techniques, cliches to avoid, plus exercises and prompts in this free guide by Writory for poets.
What this theme is
A miracle in a poem is an interruption in the expected order of things, and the poet's whole craft problem is credibility. Announce a wonder in a voice already trembling with awe and the reader ducks; report it in the tone you would use for a bus timetable and the hair on their arms stands up. Miracle poems are therefore studies in restraint: water into wine works on the page only if the poem has first made you thirsty, poured the water, and let you taste the ordinary.
The theme also comes in a second size, and the second size is where most of the great poems live. Walt Whitman spent a whole poem asking who makes much of a miracle, then answered that he knew of nothing else: wading the beach, talking by day with anyone he loved, honeybees, the thin curve of the new moon. The claim that the ordinary is already impossible is not a consolation prize. It is the theme's deepest register, and the hardest to write without going soft.
Why poets return to it
Poets write miracles because wonder is perishable and poems are preservative. A child sees the impossible daily; an adult needs it pointed out, and the miracle poem exists to do the pointing without the lecture. The theme also holds a live argument between faith and scepticism, and the poem can host that argument more honestly than an essay: the cure that might have been coincidence, the survival the family calls a blessing and the surgeon calls statistics.
It rewards craft discipline too. Because the material is extraordinary, everything else must be exact and calm, and that tension between wild content and steady technique is exactly the balance contest judges tend to reward when they score emotion against structure and language.
Where it comes from
Whitman's 'Miracles', from the 1856 Leaves of Grass, remains the theme's founding document in English: a democratic list poem that flattens the distinction between wonders, streets, sunsets, the sea, strangers, until the category of the ordinary quietly dissolves. Gerard Manley Hopkins worked the same territory from inside faith, finding the world charged with grandeur, kingfishers catching fire, every common thing ablaze if looked at hard enough.
In the twentieth century Elizabeth Bishop set 'A Miracle for Breakfast' during the Depression, a sestina in which hungry people wait for a crumb and a cup of coffee, and the miracle flickers ambiguously between mockery and vision. The lesson of the whole tradition is consistent: the poems keep the wonder checkable, anchored in bread, birds and weather, and let the reader decide what to call it.
The elements that carry it
- Bread, water, wine and oil: the miracle stories' staple props, humble enough to keep wonder honest.
- Light behaving normally: dawn through a kitchen window rendered so exactly it becomes the miracle itself.
- Hands: healing hands, bread-breaking hands, the surgeon's, the midwife's, wonder arriving through touch.
- Witnesses and their disagreements: the sister who believes, the doctor who shrugs, the crowd that saw different things.
- The list: Whitman's form, an inventory of ordinary items that accumulates into astonishment.
Techniques that work
- Report the impossible in a flat, documentary voice, times, quantities, street names, and let the plainness carry the charge.
- Earn the wonder with ordinariness first: spend two thirds of the poem on the unremarkable day into which the miracle breaks.
- Write the witnesses, not the wonder: five people describing one event differently makes the event more real than any direct description.
- Use the inventory form: list common things with increasing precision until the accumulation tips into awe, and resist explaining the tipping point.
- Keep one rational explanation alive in the poem, coincidence, medicine, weather, and let the reader choose; ambiguity is the modern miracle's oxygen.
Mistakes to avoid
- Gasping on the page: exclamation marks, 'amazing', 'wondrous'. Fix: cut every gasp and cool the voice; awe belongs to the reader, not the narrator.
- Skipping the ordinary. Fix: a miracle with no mundane context is a special effect; build the kitchen before the angelic light hits it.
- Settling the argument. Fix: a poem that insists on either the miracle or the debunking loses half its readers; hold the ambiguity.
- Calling everything a miracle until nothing is. Fix: if you take Whitman's road, earn each item with precise observation, or the list becomes a shrug.
An exercise
Describe an event from your life that someone once called a miracle, a recovery, an escape, an arrival, in exactly twelve lines of flat reportage: no adjectives of wonder, no exclamation, just times, objects and actions. Read it aloud and mark where the hair rises anyway. That spot is your poem's true centre.
A challenge
Write your own 'Miracles' list poem of ten items, but restrict every item to things visible from one window of your home, and sequence them so the final item is the smallest and the most impossible.
A prompt to start from
Write a poem about a miracle witnessed by two people who never agree afterwards on what they saw, told years later at the same kitchen table.
Before you submit
- The voice stays documentary where the content is most extraordinary.
- The ordinary setting is established before the wonder arrives.
- At least one alternative explanation survives to the final line.
- Words like 'amazing' and 'miraculous' are cut or heavily rationed.
- The ending trusts an image, bread, light, a hand, over a verdict.
By the Writory editorial team, reviewed by working poets. Updated July 2026.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.