My Critique Partner Knows Me Better Than My Wife
She has read every draft of me for fifteen years.
Ruth knew my marriage was in trouble before my wife did, because I used the word 'still' four times in one poem. She circled every one and wrote in the margin: 'Nobody says still this much unless something has stopped. Call me.' Then she gave me notes on my line breaks, because Ruth is a professional, and feelings can wait but a bad enjambment cannot.
We have been critique partners for fifteen years. I should explain what that means, because people hear 'critique partner' and imagine something polite, a book club with homework. It is not that. A critique partner is someone you hand the rawest version of your inner life every two weeks, in writing, timestamped, and they hand you theirs, and you both agree to say true things about it. There is no other relationship like it.
My therapist gets the edited version. Ruth gets the drafts.
We met in an online workshop I joined by accident. I was thirty-one, newly serious about poetry in the way only a man with no idea what he is doing can be serious, and I had signed up for a course on writing it properly, assuming I would be the most talented person there. On day one we were paired alphabetically. Mehta, meet Moreau. Ruth's first note on my first poem was eleven words long: 'Lovely. Now delete the first stanza, it's throat-clearing. The poem starts at line nine.'
She was right. She is almost always right. It remains extremely annoying.
Fifteen years, two weeks at a time. That is roughly three hundred and ninety exchanges, and I have kept all of them, which means Ruth Moreau has accidentally written the most accurate biography of me that will ever exist. It is stored in margins. 'You always drown the mother figure in adjectives. What did she actually say to you?' 'Third poem this year set in a hospital car park. Go inside the hospital, coward.' 'This is the first thing you've sent me since Diwali that isn't hiding.'
My wife, Sana, is not the jealous type, but early on she was baffled. 'You've never even met this woman,' she said, watching me pace the kitchen because Ruth's response was two days late. That was true, then. Ruth lives in Lyon. For the first nine years we were paragraphs to each other. But Sana was applying the rules of normal friendship, where closeness is built out of dinners and proximity. Critique partnership is built out of something stranger: fifteen years of watching someone's sentences flinch.
Because here is the thing nobody tells you.
You cannot hide in drafts.
The finished poem is a made bed. The draft is the room as you actually live in it, socks everywhere, one drawer open, and Ruth has stood in that room every two weeks since 2011. When my father and I stopped speaking, I did not tell her. She read a poem about a lighthouse and replied, 'The lighthouse is your father. What happened in March?' When Sana and I lost a pregnancy, I sent Ruth nothing for two months... and the nothing told her. A card arrived, no questions in it. She just wrote, 'Send me anything. A shopping list. Prose. I will critique your grief when you're ready and not one second before.'
My wife reads the finished poems. Ruth reads the drafts. And the drafts are where I actually live.
I want to be fair to my marriage here, because the title of this piece is the kind of joke that gets a man in trouble. Sana knows things about me Ruth never will. How I take my tea, what my face does before a migraine, the specific silence I produce when my mother calls. Sana knows the man. Ruth knows the machine under the man, the one that decides what he can and cannot say. Whether that is knowing me better is a question I have been arguing with myself about for years, ideally in poems, which Ruth then critiques, which does not help settle the matter.
What I can tell you is that Ruth is honest with me in a way almost nobody in a body has ever managed. People who love you in person are gentle with you, because they have to share a fridge with the consequences. Ruth once returned a poem I was proud of with a single sentence: 'This is what you write when you want to be admired instead of understood.'
I did not speak to her for eleven days... Then I rewrote the poem, and it became the first thing I ever placed in a monthly contest, and I had to email her, seething, grateful, to say the judges liked her poem very much.
She wrote back: 'Our poem. You did the typing.'
I have tried to explain to other writers why this works, and the closest I have come is an essay I read once about why safe poems lose. Safe poems lose because the writer flinched, and readers can smell a flinch through the page. A great critique partner is a professional flinch-detector. That is the entire job. Ruth cannot fix my meter better than a textbook can. What she does is point at a line and say, that, right there, is where you looked away. Fifteen years of someone pointing at where you looked away will change you, and not just on the page. These days when I catch myself telling Sana a polished version of my day, a little poem of a day with the bad stanza deleted, I hear a French accent in my skull saying 'throat-clearing' and I start again, from line nine, where the truth was.
We finally met in person two years ago. She had a conference in London; I took the train down, sweating like a man meeting a firing squad who has read all his work. I recognised her instantly... which should have been impossible. We had exchanged maybe four photos in thirteen years. But she was sitting in the café window with two coffees already ordered, one of them made exactly how I take it, because apparently I had mentioned it once, in a poem, in 2014, and she is Ruth, so it was in her notes.
We talked for six hours. It should have been strange... and it was the opposite of strange. Somewhere in hour four she said, quietly, 'You know the still poem? I nearly didn't send that note. It felt like reading your mail.' And I told her the truth, which is that the note probably saved my marriage, because it sent me home to Sana with the one question I had been drafting around for a year, and Sana, God bless her, answered it, and we did the work... and the word 'still' has gone back to meaning still.
Ruth nodded. Then she took out my latest poem, and there was a circle on it, obviously, and she slid it across the table between the two cooling cups.
'Lovely,' she said. 'Now. Stanza one is throat-clearing.'
Fifteen years. The poem still starts at line nine.
So do I.
By Team Writory, for Writory.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.