My Fiercest Critic Sends the Kindest Letters
She shreds my drafts and stitches me back in the postscript.
The first letter Meera ever sent me contained the sentence “This poem is a greeting card wearing a trench coat,” and I have kept it for eleven years.
We met at a weekend workshop in Delhi, the kind held in a rented classroom that smells of chalk dust and ambition. Sixteen strangers reading tender first drafts aloud. When my turn ended, fifteen people said “lovely” in various keys. Meera, seated by the window in a mustard shawl, waited for the murmuring to die and asked, “Which line did you actually mean?”
The room went quiet the way rooms do when somebody finally says the true thing.
I intended to be offended... Instead I found her at the tea counter afterward and demanded specifics, and she gave them, unhurried, stirring her tea like she had the whole afternoon. My first stanza was throat clearing. My ending explained the poem instead of trusting it. And my one good line, the one about my grandmother's kitchen window, was buried under four bad ones like a ring in a drawer full of receipts.
“That window line,” she said. “That one you meant. Write me more of those.”
She was right... That was the infuriating part. She has been right, with brief insufferable exceptions, for eleven years.
Meera moved to a small hill town the following spring, to a house with a mango tree and a postal address longer than some of my poems. She distrusts screens for reading. “A poem on a screen is always about to become something else,” she told me once. “A poem on paper has to sit there and be judged.” So we write letters. Actual paper, actual stamps, actual weeks of waiting that turn every draft into a message in a bottle.
Her critiques arrive in red ink. Margins crammed to the edges. GREETING CARD, in capitals, when I get sentimental. “You are hiding behind the weather again.” “This rhyme was available because it is worthless.” “Stop performing grief you have not paid for.” Once she returned a poem with a single red line through all twenty-two of its lines and, underneath, the words: “The title was honest. Start there.”
But then there are the postscripts.
Every brutal letter ends with a P.S. written in blue ink, a different pen entirely, sometimes visibly written at a different hour. “P.S. How is your father's knee? Ask him directly. Do not wait for him to offer it.” “P.S. The mango tree fruited early this year. I thought of your window line.” “P.S. You are better than this draft. That is the only reason I bother.”
Red ink for the poem. Blue ink for the person.
For years I assumed it was just her filing system...
I quit writing twice in that decade. Both times, a letter arrived within the month, as if she could smell surrender from four hundred kilometers away.
The second time, I had sent her a poem I knew was safe, tidy, likable, and a small journal had accepted it, and I expected, for once, congratulations. What I got was two red pages taking the poem apart hinge by hinge. Around that time I had read an essay on why safe poems lose and mailed her a copy as a joke. She sent it back with one line across the top: “I could have said this shorter. The reader can smell your fear.”
The P.S. under that massacre said: “Send the frightening one. The one in your bottom drawer. Fear is just the poem's pulse.” She then all but ordered me to enter it into a monthly poetry contest, and the frightening one, the poem about my grandmother's last winter, went further than anything safe I had ever written. I did not learn the lesson gracefully. I did learn it.
People warn you about harsh critics and they warn you about flatterers. Nobody warns you how rare honest friends are, the ones who can hold both truths in one envelope: your poem is failing, and you are loved.
Last October, after eleven years of paper, I finally visited the hill town. The mango tree was real. The mustard shawl was on a hook by the door. And in her study, in a filing cabinet that groaned when she opened it, was every draft I had ever mailed her, ordered by year, my whole embarrassing education in one drawer.
On the shelf above it sat a shoebox. She hesitated, then handed it down.
Inside were poems, typed, yellowed, dated thirty years back. Her name on every one.
And across them, in slashing black ink, another person's handwriting: withering, contemptuous, clever the way broken glass is clever. Sentimental female nonsense. Give this up. You are wasting a man's time.
There were no postscripts.
There was no blue ink anywhere in that box.
Her teacher, she said. A famous man, dead now, much anthologized. She was twenty-four.
She never wrote another poem.
“He was right about some of the poems,” she said, closing the lid with the care people reserve for coffins. “He was wrong about me. It took me thirty years to understand those are two different sentences.”
We sat with our tea going cold, and I finally understood the two pens. The red ink was everything he had taught her about standards. The blue ink was everything he had refused her, invented from scratch, one postscript at a time, and given to a stranger from a workshop who had exactly one honest line about a kitchen window.
“Honesty about the work, kindness for the person. The whole craft of friendship is never mixing up which one gets the red pen.”
She said that on the porch, my last evening there, and then, because she is Meera, she immediately criticized the way I peeled an orange.
Before I left, I asked the question I had been carrying up the mountain. Would she try again? Thirty years is long, but it is not forever. She looked at me the way she looks at a weak stanza.
But in December, folded inside my usual shredding, there was an extra page... A poem. Hers. The first in three decades, about a black-ink man and a mango tree, and it was not safe at all. I read it standing up in my kitchen, by the window, holding my breath. She had written her way toward healing the way she had taught me to write toward everything: directly, and too late, and right on time.
I did the only loving thing I knew. I took out a red pen and went through it line by line, sparing nothing, because two of the lines truly did not deserve her. Then I changed pens and wrote, in blue: “P.S. He wasted thirty years of your time. You did not waste a single day of mine. Send the next one.”
She wrote back on a postcard: “Framed your letter. The critique was adequate.”
Adequate... Eleven years, and that is the finest review she has ever given me.
Her latest envelope arrived on Tuesday. The red ink is thinner these days, the hand less steady, and the margins have gotten kinder in ways I pretend not to notice. But the postscript is blue as ever, and it asks about my father's knee before it asks about my poem, and I have already read it four times.
Some people keep love letters. I keep hers, which are both.
By Team Writory, for Writory.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.