Ninety-Nine Rejections, Then the Phone Rang
I had a spreadsheet of noes and no plan for a yes.
The spreadsheet was called Noes.xlsx, and I tended it the way other people tend ferns.
Column A held the date I submitted. Column B, the magazine. Column C, the poem. Column D counted the days I waited, and Column E recorded whether the rejection was a form letter or a personal note. Column F was my favorite. I labeled it sting, and I scored every no from one to ten, the way hospitals ask you to rate pain while you are busy having it.
Ninety-nine rows. Three years and two months. I could tell you which season hurt the most (spring of the second year, four form rejections in nine days, average sting 8.5), and which rejection I printed out and taped above my desk: a note from a journal in Manchester where some editor had scrawled six words in blue ink. Not this one. But keep going. I read those words every morning like a horoscope, and like a horoscope, I believed them exactly as much as I needed to that day.
People ask why anyone would keep a spreadsheet of failure, and the honest answer is that I needed the failure to look like data instead of a diagnosis. Data can trend. A diagnosis just sits in a folder with your name on it.
My sister called the file morbid. My roommate called it the saddest Excel document in the northern hemisphere. But I noticed something the noes could never touch: every row was also proof that I had finished a poem, formatted it, believed in it enough to click send at eleven on a Sunday night. Ninety-nine rows of no meant ninety-nine separate acts of hope, and hope with a timestamp is much harder to dismiss than hope in the abstract.
The first no arrived when I was twenty-six.
It came from a journal so small that its entire website was one page and a photograph of a lake. I had convinced myself they would take my poem because, frankly, who else was submitting to them? Everyone, it turns out... everyone was submitting to them. I read the rejection in a supermarket parking lot with the groceries sweating in the trunk, and I cried real tears over a publication I had discovered eleven days earlier. That is the embarrassing arithmetic of wanting something: eleven days of acquaintance, one full afternoon of grief.
The second no stung less. By the tenth, I had built the spreadsheet. By the thirtieth, I had a routine: Sunday nights, kitchen table, the laptop with the cracked hinge propped against the fruit bowl, a mug of tea I always intended to drink and always let go cold. I would send out three poems, log them in their little cells, and feel briefly like a person with a plan instead of a person with a wound.
Somewhere around row forty, I noticed the poems themselves were changing.
They were getting neater... safer. Symmetrical little machines with tidy last lines, poems wearing job interview clothes. I had started sanding off anything that embarrassed me, which meant I was sanding off anything that was true. The rejections kept arriving anyway, except now they were rejections of work I did not even love, which is a very specific kind of losing: betting someone else's horse and still paying your own money.
Then one night, instead of submitting, I read an essay about why safe poems lose, and one line stopped me cold: editors rarely reject bad poems first, because bad poems are at least alive. They reject forgettable ones. I sat at the kitchen table for a long time after that. The tea went cold on schedule.
That same week I wrote a poem about my father's hands in twenty minutes. His actual hands: the engine grease in the knuckle creases that no soap ever fully lifted, the missing sliver of thumbnail he lost to a fan belt in 1989, the way he counted money twice, slowly, like tenderness. I had never written about him. Writing it felt like reading my diary over a loudspeaker, and when I finished I sat very still, the way you do after a near miss in traffic.
I nearly deleted it... instead I entered it into a monthly poetry contest before I could talk myself out of the whole thing, and then sent it to six journals, including a tiny publication called Small Weather that had already rejected me once, back at row sixty-one.
The noes trickled in across a gray winter. Rows ninety-four through ninety-nine, all six of them. The sting scores were low, threes and fours. Not because it hurt less... because I had gone a little numb, the way your hand does when you hold ice too long and the cold starts reporting itself as nothing at all.
Then, on a Tuesday at 4:40 in the afternoon, the phone rang.
An unknown number. I answered expecting a robot with urgent news about my car's extended warranty. Instead a woman's voice, older, with a smoker's gravel, said, "Is this the person who wrote the poem about the father's hands?"
It was the editor of Small Weather. She had rejected that exact poem three months earlier. Row ninety-six, form letter, sting score three.
And here is the part I still turn over at night: she was not calling to deliver a yes she had already decided.
She was calling because the no had refused to hold.
"There's a line I haven't been able to put down," she said. "He counted the money twice, like tenderness. I've thought about it while doing my own accounts, which I promise has never happened with a poem before." She was assembling an issue about fathers. Was the piece still available?
I said yes so fast I startled her. Then I laughed, and she asked what was funny, and I told her about the spreadsheet. She went quiet for a second and said, "Read me the tally." So I stood in my kitchen and read a stranger the anatomy of ninety-nine rejections while she made small approving sounds down the line, like a doctor listening to a stubborn but healthy heart.
A rejection is not a verdict. It is a receipt: proof that the work went somewhere, and passed through human hands on its way back.
Everyone talks about persistence in writing as if it were a wall you shoulder through, all grit and bleeding knuckles and training montages. Mine never looked like that. Mine was a kettle, a cracked laptop hinge, Sunday nights, and a spreadsheet with a column called sting.
Persistence, it turns out, is mostly clerical.
You keep the records. You keep the appointment with the kitchen table. The drama, if it ever comes, arrives by phone on a Tuesday while your soup is boiling over.
And the poem was never really about hands. It was about family, about everything I did not know how to say across a dinner table, so I said it across a page instead. The safe poems could not carry any of that. They were built, carefully and deliberately, not to.
My father does not know the poem exists yet. The issue comes out in October. I am going to hand it to him without a word of explanation and watch him find himself in it, and while he reads I am going to memorize what his hands do, because I suspect there is another poem in that, and this time I will not wait three years to send it.
I never renamed the spreadsheet. Noes.xlsx has a hundredth row now, typed in green: the journal, the poem, zero days waited.
And in the sting column, for the first time in three years... nothing at all.
By Team Writory, for Writory.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.