The Letters I Write to the Boy I Was
He needed someone to explain things kindly; I finally volunteered.
The first letter began, of all things, with an apology for my handwriting. Which tells you everything about the boy I was writing to, because he was the one who taught me that you apologize before anyone has a chance to be disappointed in you.
I was thirty-four, sitting at my kitchen table at 11 p.m. with a legal pad and a pen that skipped, and my therapist's voice in my head saying, try writing to him. Not about him. To him. I had laughed in her office. I told her it sounded like the kind of exercise you see in a movie right before the character has a breakthrough in the rain. She said, and I remember this exactly, "You write letters to companies that overcharge you by four dollars. You can write one to a nine-year-old."
So. Dear Aarav, I wrote. Sorry about the handwriting.
Then I sat there for twenty minutes...
The problem with writing to the boy you were is that you know too much about him. I knew that he kept his report cards in a shoebox under his bed, not the good ones, the bad ones, so he could quiz himself on his failures. I knew that he practiced saying "I'm fine" in the bathroom mirror because his voice cracked when he said it in real life. I knew about the night in October when he stood in the hallway listening to his parents argue about money and decided, with the terrible efficiency of a child, that the solution was for him to need less. Less food he actually liked. Less help with homework. Less noticing.
He shrank himself so smoothly that everyone thanked him for being easy.
What do you write to that kid? The self-help version is obvious. You did nothing wrong, none of it was your fault, you deserved love.
All true. All useless.
He would have read those sentences the way he read greeting cards from distant aunts, politely, with no absorption whatsoever. He didn't trust kindness that arrived in bulk.
So I wrote him the way I'd write to a smart, suspicious friend. I told him the ending first, because he hated suspense. I told him we make it. I told him we live in an apartment where nobody yells, and the fridge hums, and there is a shelf with more books than he would believe, and some nights I read until 2 a.m. just because no one is going to come in and turn the light off angrily. I told him that in the winter I buy the expensive oranges. He would care about that. The oranges were a whole thing for us.
Then I told him the part I'd been avoiding for twenty-five years. I wrote: the hallway thing didn't work. You made yourself smaller and they did not fight less. It was never a lever you could pull. You spent years pulling it anyway, and I'm not angry at you for that, but I need you to put it down now, because I'm the one still holding it.
I cried onto a legal pad at my own kitchen table like a person in exactly the kind of movie I had mocked.
I kept writing after that. Not every day. Whenever something happened that he would need explained. When my boss praised me in a meeting and my whole body braced like praise was the wind-up before a slap, I went home and wrote him a letter about it. "Dear Aarav. Today a man said 'great work' and we waited for the catch... There was no catch. I checked twice. I'm telling you because I know you'll want the data." When I snapped at someone I loved and heard my father's cadence come out of my own mouth, I wrote to him about that too, because he deserved to know the enemy had gotten inside the walls, and that we were handling it.
Somewhere around the tenth letter, something strange happened.
He started answering.
Not literally. I want to be clear that my mail carrier is not delivering envelopes from 1999. But when I wrote to him regularly, I started hearing his side. I'd write "you didn't have to be perfect" and feel the pushback rise in my chest, immediate and specific: yes I did, you weren't there on the days it worked. And he was right, that was the awful part... Sometimes it did work. Sometimes being perfect bought a quiet dinner. Intermittent rewards, a scientist would say. The most addictive kind. Nobody clings to a strategy that never works. We cling to the ones that work occasionally.
That was the first time I understood that healing the boy I was could not mean lecturing him. He wasn't wrong. He was a brilliant kid solving an unsolvable problem with the only tools in the house. My job was not to correct him.
My job was to walk into the room where he was still standing guard, and take the night shift, and tell him he could finally go to bed.
The letters changed shape after that. Less explaining, more company. I told him about the friend who texts me "landed safe?" after every flight. I told him about learning, at thirty-four, to say "that hurt my feelings" out loud, and how the world did not end, and how the person actually apologized, and how I went into the bathroom afterward and looked in the mirror, our old rehearsal spot, and grinned like an idiot.
I told him I'd started writing poems, which he would find embarrassing, and that some of them were about him, which he would find mortifying. One of them I even entered into a monthly poetry contest, with our full name on it, visible, findable, the opposite of small. It didn't win. I wrote him a letter about that too, because I wanted him to see what losing looks like when it isn't fatal: you feel a sting, you eat something good, you write the next one. Later I found other poems about childhood written by strangers, and it staggered me, how many adults were out there writing letters backward through time. A whole postal service of it. All of us apologizing for our handwriting.
People ask if the letters work, and I never know how to answer, because "work" is the hallway lever again, the idea that the right effort produces the fixed result. It's not like that. It's slower and weirder. Here is what I can report. Last month I dropped a glass, a good one, and it exploded across the kitchen tile, and the old reflex fired: brace, apologize, shrink. And then... a second voice came, and the second voice was mine, the grown one, the letter writer. It said, out loud, in my empty kitchen, "It's just a glass, buddy."
Buddy. I heard myself say it and had to sit down.
Because that's the whole thing, isn't it. That's what he needed the entire time. Not a rescue. Not a lecture on forgiveness, though we got there eventually, by the scenic route.
He needed one adult in the building who would look at the broken glass, and then at him, and choose him.
Every letter is just that choice, made again, in ink.
I still write them. The pen still skips. His shoebox of bad report cards is long gone, lost in some move, but I keep the letters in a shoebox under my bed anyway, on purpose, in the same spot where he kept his evidence against himself. It felt right that the location stay the same and the verdict change.
Last week's letter was two lines long.
Dear Aarav. We bought the expensive oranges again. They're in the blue bowl where you can see them.
By Team Writory, for Writory.
Enter a Writory poetry contest
Enter the September contest and have your own poem read and scored. That first entry makes you a Writorian.